How Do You Calculate the Net Gravitational Force on a Mass in a 3D Force System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter harrysawizard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Forces Sum
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the net gravitational force on a 1kg mass at the origin from surrounding spherical masses, the gravitational force equation F = G m1m2/r² is utilized, where G is the gravitational constant. The forces in the x, y, and z directions are computed, resulting in components Sigmax, Sigmay, and Sigmaz. The total magnitude of the force is found using the equation √(Fx² + Fy² + Fz²). For direction, unit vectors can be derived by dividing each component by the magnitude, or the force can be expressed as a vector (Fx, Fy, Fz). Understanding these calculations is essential for solving the problem effectively.
harrysawizard
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cube has an edge length of 2.0m. At each corner there is a different spherical mass. The masses are 1kg, 2kg, 3kg, 4kg, etc. u to 8kg. They Coordinate system: 1kg is at the origin and the 4kg, 2kg, and 8kg masses lie on the positive x, y, and z axis respectively. What is the net gravitational force acting on the 1kg mass? (magnitude and direction)

(I know I don't have an image, but it won't let me insert one and at the point I'm at, I think I'm past needing the image)

Homework Equations


To find the force each mass is putting on the 1kg mass, I used equation:
F = G m1m2/r2
where G is 6.67 * 10-11 and r is the distance between 2 objects.

I substituted 1 for m1 and 2 for r, coming up with simplified equation:
F = (6.67*10-11) (m2) / 4

The Attempt at a Solution


I used that equation to find the x, y, and z components of every force.
I then added to find \Sigmax, \Sigmay, and \Sigmaz.
I got:
\Sigmax = 3.0015 * 10-10
\Sigmay = 2.668 * 10-10
\Sigmaz = 4.3355 * 10-10

My question is, what do I do now to find the total magnitude of the force?
Once I get that, how do I find the angle / direction of the force?

If I were to use the 3-d distance equation, how would I find the angle?
I'm completely stuck, so any help is greatly appreciated!

Thanks so much guys, this is my first day on the site so I don't quite know what I'm doing! (:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
is no one answering because my wording is way off or is it something else? just wondering!
 
welcome to pf!

hi harrysawizard! welcome to pf! :smile:

(have a sigma: ∑ :wink:)
harrysawizard said:
My question is, what do I do now to find the total magnitude of the force?
Once I get that, how do I find the angle / direction of the force?

you've found Fx Fy and Fz

so the force is the vector (Fx,Fy,Fz) …

its magnitude is √(Fx2 + Fy2 + Fz2), and for the unit vector of the direction, just divide by the magnitude! :wink:

(btw, you can't generally expect quick answers here … people are asleep, or doing something … you should give it 24 hours before worrying)
 
thanks so much for all your help!
i used the distance formula for 3 dimensions and get 5.9096 * 10-10 to be the final magnitude.

We've only covered a bit of unit vectors in math, and we haven't touched them at all in physics, so how would I use them to find the direction?

When it's just 2 dimensions that I'm finding the net force of, I'll break the vector down into x and y and use the inverse tangent to find \Theta, but I just don't understand how to approach it in 3 dimensions.
 
hi harrysawizard! :smile:

(have a theta: θ :wink:)
harrysawizard said:
… When it's just 2 dimensions that I'm finding the net force of, I'll break the vector down into x and y and use the inverse tangent to find \Theta, but I just don't understand how to approach it in 3 dimensions.

You could use Euler angles (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler_angles" ), but i don't think anybody does for something like this …

you either specify the unit vector, or you just leave it as (Fx,Fy,Fz)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top