MHB How Do You Calculate the Slope to Intercept a Moving Point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AlienNova
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slope Speed
AlienNova
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Sorry for the very confusing title, I couldn't think of a different way to better explain my question shortly. Also please bare with me, I find this very hard to explain.

So I'm trying to find the slope between two points when one point is moving in a set direction with a set speed. Confused? I'm not the best with words.

Okay, so normally to find the slope of two points you use the simple formula (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1). That's the quickest way to intersect a point (Now on going to be called point A) if point A is stationary. But what if point A is moving (In a set direction, not turning)?

Say point A is a someone you want to talk to, and they're walking. When walking to them you don't walk straight at them, you walk to a point where your two paths will cross at the same time. My question is how do you find the slope you decided to walk?

Hopefully that didn't just make things more complicated to understand. Any help will be appreciated!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You could use parametric equations, if you have enough data.
Say the slope of the path of the moving object is 1. Then
x(t) = t + c and y(t) = t + d, where c and d are the starting
x and y coordinates, respectively. So you'd need to know
the slope of the trajectory of the moving object and the x and y
coordinates of its starting position.

Another example: Slope 3/2, (time, t, in seconds) and a starting position of (3, 2):

x(t) = 2t + 3, y(t) = 3t + 2.

For your problem you may then compute (y2 - y(t))/(x2 - x(t)).
 
Last edited:
Thank you so much, it took me a couple read throughs but I understand it now!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top