How Do You Calculate the Speed and Maximum Height of a Stone Thrown Upward?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the speed and maximum height of a stone thrown upward, start by applying the kinematic equations, specifically v = v0 + at and y = y0 + v0t + (1/2)at². Given that the stone passes point A with speed v and point B 3.0 m higher at speed (1/2)v, recognize that acceleration due to gravity is -9.8 m/s². Establish two equations based on the known heights and speeds to solve for the unknowns. Utilizing algebra will help derive the necessary values for speed and maximum height above point B. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving similar physics problems effectively.
pyromonkey39
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A stone is thrown vertically upward. On its way up it passes point A with speed v and point B 3.0 m higher than point A.With speed (1/2)*v Calculate a. the speed v b. the maximum height reached by the stone above point B.

Homework Equations



v = v0 + at

The Attempt at a Solution


I wrote down all the information given and then drew a picture but I am not entirely sure where to start. I assumed that acceleration would be -9.8 m/s due to gravity but if i don't know time how can I calculate what is being asked.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you been given a formula something to this degree?

y = y0 + v0t + \frac{1}{2}at2
 
that was in the chapter but my professor has not gone over it in class yet so I am not sure on how to go about using it
 
If your professor is not giving you the proper instruction. Try watching lectures online to stay caught up before you fall behind and have no idea what is going on. Check out open course ware at mit.edu, they have many many video lectures. The Physics I guy is a genius and a great teacher.

As for your problem, here is the best advice I can offer you. Try to think about the things you know. You know that at a point y=3.0 m (if you define point A as y=0), there is a velocity that is half the starting velocity.

If you set it up right, you should have 2 equations with 2 unknowns. Use some algebra skills and you should find some useful information.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top