How Do You Convert a Complex Spiral Equation from Polar to Cartesian Form?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rohitpi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian
AI Thread Summary
To convert the complex spiral equation |z| = arg(z) from polar to Cartesian form, the discussion emphasizes using the angle θ as the parameter. The parametric equations derived are x = θ cos(θ) and y = θ sin(θ), where r = |z| = arg(z) = θ. The original poster expressed confusion in finding these equations and acknowledged the need for clarity in their query. The Cartesian equation was noted to be as simplified as possible given the context. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of defining parameters clearly when converting between forms.
Rohitpi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm volunteering in a summer school for year 12 students in my area, and have to teach them a few topics. I've been struggling to get the parametric equations from this.

Sketch: |z| = \arg(z)

So I thought that the obvious way to explain it to them would be to say: "that as the magnitude of z increases (ie. distance from the origin) the greater the angle becomes, thus producing a spiral" and I can draw it on the whiteboard.

Upon attempting the Cartesian equation, I got a bit stuck:
|z| = \arg(z)
\sqrt{x^2 + y^2} = \tan^{-1}(\frac{y}{x})
\tan{(\sqrt{x^2 + y^2)}}=\frac{y}{x}
y=x\tan{({\sqrt{x^2 + y^2}})}

And that is where I get stuck unfortunately. Any thoughts/solutions on how to proceed in finding a Cartesian and/or parametric equations?

(sorry if this doesn't make sense, I haven't done any maths since year 12 haha as I study med atm :/ I miss maths!)

Thanks :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You titled this "Cartesian equations" and refer to the Cartesian equation in the body but also ask for parametric equations. Which do you want?

You haven't said what parameter you want to use. I would recommend the angle \theta= arg(z). Then x= r cos(\theta) and y= rsin(\theta) while r= |z|= arg(z)= \theta so the parametric equations are just x= \theta cos(\theta), y= \theta sin(\theta).

As for the Cartesian equation, I think you have it about a simple as you are going to get it.
 
Ah, thanks! Sorry about the title, I should have included both Parametric and Cartesian. The issue I had with the parametric was as you alluded to, I actually didn't know where to start (hence the query was vague).

Thanks a lot! :)
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top