How Do You Convert a Vector into Cartesian Unit Vector Notation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aessex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
To convert the vector V, representing a displacement of 120 km at an angle of 29.0° counterclockwise from the x-axis, into Cartesian unit vector notation, one must determine its x and y components. The components can be calculated using trigonometric functions: x = r * cos(theta) and y = r * sin(theta). In this case, x would be 120 km * cos(29.0°) and y would be 120 km * sin(29.0°). The final representation in unit vector notation is V = xi + yj, where i and j are the unit vectors in the x and y directions, respectively. Understanding this conversion is essential for expressing vectors in Cartesian coordinates.
aessex
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
might be overlooking something. here is the problem.

Vector V represents a displacement of 120km at 29.0* counterclockwise from the x axis.
Write V in unit vector notation.


Andrew
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is simple geometry. Draw a diagram with the x and y-axis and draw your angled vector. Now what is the vector in cartesian coordinates? Do you know what the components are of an arbitrary vector in cartesian?
 
Interesting. You are given the unit notation in (r,theta). You want the unit notation in (x,y), I presume.
 
yes unit notation in (x,y). I just can't seem to find that in my notes and was wondering the best way to go about getting the notation in that form from what I am given.
 
I apologize if it isn't polite to give too much of a hint on PF, but here aessex: Unit notation in cartesian is given simply by v = xi + yj where i, j are the x, y unit vectors respectively and x, y are the horizontal and vertical components. I suppose you have enough trig knowledge to figure out the x and y components given (r, theta).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top