How Do You Convert GeV/c to m/s for Particle Velocities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iamBevan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convert
iamBevan
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
As the title said :)

I'm trying to find the velocity of a particle with a momentum of between 23 and 150 GeV/c. I found that 1 GeV/c = 5.36 x 10^-19 kg-m/s, and tried to divide by the mass of the particle - this just game me values between 7m/s and some crazy numbers.

What am I doing wrong :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One way is to use the relation
E^2=\left(mc^2 \right)^2+\left(pc \right)^2
where pc is 23 to 150 GeV (momentum in energy units), and mc^2 is the particle's rest mass (proton is 0.938 GeV). Then use \beta =pc/E to get \beta, and v=\beta c.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your help Bob S - I still can't manage to get the answer though.

When I set m to 5.5208x10^27kg, and p to 25GeV/c I end up getting a value that is faster than c when I solve for v. Can anyone help with this?
 
If 1 GeV/c = 5.36 x 10-19 kg-m/s though, why can't I do 25(5.36x10^-19)/particle's mass?
 
Using the relation
E^2=\left(mc^2 \right)^2+\left(pc \right)^2
where pc= 50 GeV and mc^2= 0.938 GeV, E = 50.008798 GeV.
So β= 50/ 50.008798= 0.99982 and βc = 2.9974 x 1010 cm/sec
 
iamBevan said:
If 1 GeV/c = 5.36 x 10-19 kg-m/s though, why can't I do 25(5.36x10^-19)/particle's mass?

Because p ≠ mv, if you're using the particle's "rest mass" in kg. The correct equation is

$$p = \frac{mv}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}$$
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top