How Do You Creat A Moving Mental Image From An Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phalid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image
Phalid
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
When you read an equation, how are you able to then take the bits of that equation and translate it into a mental picture that allows you to visualize what the particular equation is describing?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It helps to be familiar with basic functions commonly found in math (and physics, for that matter): sine, cosine, exponential, polynomial, reciprocal, etc. You can form a mental picture if you have already seen a particular class of function many times before.

If a function is some complicated mixture of other functions, one may just have to create an actual graph rather than trying to visualize it mentally.
 
graph it
 
What an equation "describes" depends upon the application, not the equation. Exactly the same equation may describe many different situations. If you mean "given an equation, determine some some situation that it might describe", perhaps to give you some ideas on how to simplify the equation or do something else with it, that comes with having done lots and lots of appliations.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top