How Do You Derive the Lagrangian for a Circuit with Repeated Cells?

T-7
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Hello folks,

I could really do with a few hints with this. (As soon as possible!)

Homework Statement



For a repeated line of cells, two 'equations of motion' can be written:

C_{n}\dot{U_{n+1}} = I_{n}-I_{n+1}
L_{n}\dot{I_{n}} = U_{n} - U_{n+1}

where C_{n} is the capacitance, U_{n+1} the voltage after the nth cell, I_{n}-I_{n+1} the charging current, L_{n} the inductance.

Work out the Lagrangian that generated these equations.

You should find that

E = \sum_{n}\left( (1/2)\L_{n}\dot{Q_{n}}^{2} + (1/2)C_{n}U_{n+1}^{2} \right)

and

H = (1/2)\sum_{n}\left( \frac{P_{n}^{2}}{L_n}} + \frac{(Q_{n+1}-Q_{n})^{2}}{C_{n}} \right)

Homework Equations



Note that
Q_{n} = -\int I_{n} dt => C_{n}U_{n+1} = Q_{n+1} - Q_{n}

The Attempt at a Solution



I have suggested a Lagrangian of

L = (1/2)L_{n}\dot{Q_{n}}^{2} + Q_{n}(U_{n+1}-U_{n}) + (1/2)C_{n}\dot{U_{n+1}^{2}} + U_{n+1}(I_{n}-I_{n+1})

(which can be turned into a sum for all the repeated circuits)

but it doesn't seem convincing, despite the fact that you can recover the original 'equations of motion' using Euler-Lagrange equations (using Q and U).

I'm not sure how the energy is being derived from the Lag. in this case (in mechanics, it was always the case that L = T - U, hence E = T + U), and it seems clear that you aren't going to get either that expression for the energy or that Hamiltonian from my guess-work Lagrangian.

Any suggestions?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think Ulf would like this any more than Chris.
 
Anony-mouse said:
I don't think Ulf would like this any more than Chris.

What?
 
malawi_glenn said:
What?

I think Anony. is under the impression that, being part of a set Q, this isn't up for discussion. According to the tutor I asked, we *can* discuss these Qs with other Physicists, exchange ideas, argue, etc. What we're not allowed to do is just copy someone's answer (which PhysicsForums also prohibits).
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top