How Do You Derive the Range Maximizing Equation in Projectile Motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raywashere
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the range maximizing equation for projectile motion in a calculus-based physics context. The original range equation is given, and the goal is to derive the equation θ = cot^-1(√(1 + (2gh/v_o^2))). Participants emphasize the importance of differentiation techniques, particularly the product and chain rules, to handle the equation effectively. There is confusion regarding the role of gravity as a constant in differentiation, with a clarification that it does not become zero and that the variable p (sin²(θ)) is not constant. The conversation highlights the need for a solid understanding of calculus principles to successfully complete the derivation.
Raywashere
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is for calc based physics, and the new phs prof wants us to derive this equation for a projectile motion lab.

From this range equation: R(theta) = (v_o^2cos(theta) / g) * [sin(theta) + \sqrt{sin^2(theta+ (2gh/v_o^2}]

he wants us to derive this range maximizing equation: (theta)=cot^-1\sqrt{}1 + (2gh/v_o^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I was able to differentiate the inside of the sqrrt to 1 + 2gh/v_o^2 , because I made sin^2(theta) = to p and that just differentiated to 1, but how the heck do you get cot^-1?

also, another thing that is throwing me off is the fact that g(gravity) is a constant, so won't that just go to 0? but if that happens then the range equation can't be differentiated...right?

someone help...please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Raywashere said:

Homework Statement



This is for calc based physics, and the new phs prof wants us to derive this equation for a projectile motion lab.

From this range equation: R(theta) = (v_o^2cos(theta) / g) * [sin(theta) + \sqrt{sin^2(theta+ (2gh/v_o^2}]

he wants us to derive this range maximizing equation: (theta)=cot^-1\sqrt{}1 + (2gh/v_o^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I was able to differentiate the inside of the sqrt to 1 + 2gh/v_o^2 , because I made sin^2(theta) = to p and that just differentiated to 1, but how the heck do you get cot^-1?

also, another thing that is throwing me off is the fact that g(gravity) is a constant, so won't that just go to 0? but if that happens then the range equation can't be differentiated...right?

someone help...please.
I don't mean to insult you, but your new UCLA phys. prof. probably figures that his students know how to differentiate a wide variety of functions and can handle the product rule & chain rule in particular.

BTW: if p = sin2θ , then dp/dθ ≠ 0, because p is not a constant. In fact, dp/dθ = 2(sinθ)(cosθ).

ALSO: if \theta = \cot^{-1}\sqrt{1 + (2gh/{v_0}^2)}, that means \cot(\theta) = \sqrt{1 + (2gh/{v_0}^2)}

What did you get for dR/dθ ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top