How Do You Determine if a Line Segment Intersects a Square in 2D Geometry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eniven
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Programming
AI Thread Summary
To determine if a line segment intersects a square in 2D geometry, one must check if either endpoint of the line segment is inside the square or if the line crosses any of the square's sides. If the line segment intersects at least one of the square's four edges, it indicates that part of the line is within the square. The discussion highlights the use of equations defining both the line segment and the square's boundaries to analyze intersections. Additionally, inequalities derived from the line's equation can help ascertain the position of points relative to the line and the square. Ultimately, understanding these geometric relationships is crucial for applications such as analyzing fractures in rock formations.
eniven
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am trying to determine whether or not any part of a line segment is located within a square box.

I have the coordinates of the line segment end points and the corners of the square box.

This problem is easy for the case where one or both end points are located in the box, but I don't know what to do when the line crosses the box but both end points are located outside the box.

This problem is in 2D.

Anyone have any thoughts? Thanks in advance.

Edited to add: This is not homework. I'm working on a PhD in a petroleum engineering related field. I am actually trying to determine the fractal dimension of fractures in rock (in 2D) and for this part I am using the box counting method. So, I'm trying to figure out if the line (the fracture) is located in the box.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is an equation that defines the line segment, right?

There are equations that define the four line segments that define the square, right?

If the line segent is partially inside the square, it must intersect at least one of the four line segments that make up the square, right?

If it intersects none of them, it doesn't cross the square.
 
I'm not sure if I got the question right, but if you're asking if any part of a line segment is in a box, then you should be able to connect the endpoints of the line and see if it crosses the sides of the box (if it does, then part of the line segment is in the box).
 
Thanks guys! I feel like a bit of a doofus for not thinking of that! :redface:
 
Another way to do it is this: Every straight line determines a specific inequality. That is, if the line is given by ax+ by+ c= 0 then every point on one side of the line satisfies ax+ by+ c> 0 and every point on the other side satisfies ax+ by+ c< 0. Given a single point inside the box, you can determine what inequalities every point inside the box must satisfy and use that to determine whether the endpoints of the line segment are inside the box or not. That should be simpler than solving equations to determine where or if the given line segment intersects a side.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Another way to do it is this: Every straight line determines a specific inequality. That is, if the line is given by ax+ by+ c= 0 then every point on one side of the line satisfies ax+ by+ c> 0 and every point on the other side satisfies ax+ by+ c< 0. Given a single point inside the box, you can determine what inequalities every point inside the box must satisfy and use that to determine whether the endpoints of the line segment are inside the box or not. That should be simpler than solving equations to determine where or if the given line segment intersects a side.

Hmm, that's clever, but what about the case where neither end point of the line are inside the square yet the line crosses the square?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top