How do you determine the natural frequency of a solid?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the natural frequency of solids, particularly in the context of large structures like buildings. Participants explore various methods, theoretical considerations, and complexities involved in the analysis of natural frequencies across different materials and geometries.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that natural frequencies can be determined by applying a constant external force with a specific angular frequency to different materials, suggesting that the frequency at which the material breaks may indicate its natural frequency.
  • Others argue that the problem is more complicated, requiring the use of equations governing deflection or bending based on material properties, leading to a system of coupled oscillators and the characterization of fundamental modes of oscillation.
  • A participant mentions the use of a "rap test" or "plink test" to induce impulses in structures, allowing for the identification of natural frequencies through FFT algorithms, although they express uncertainty about the applicability of this method to complex systems like buildings.
  • Another participant emphasizes that there is not just one natural frequency for a solid, as structures can vibrate in multiple ways, with different modes corresponding to various degrees of freedom, suggesting the need for modeling with simple geometries before applying finite element methods for complex shapes.
  • It is noted that natural frequencies can differ for longitudinal and compressional waves, indicating the complexity of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that determining natural frequencies is complex and involves multiple factors, but there is no consensus on the best methods or approaches to take, especially regarding large structures like buildings.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific material properties, the complexity of structures with multiple materials, and the need for precise definitions of natural frequencies across different modes of vibration.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
All solids have a natural frequency but how do you determine its value?

How would you determine it for a large building?

I'll guess that for each different material they apply a constant external force with a specific angular frequency. The force with an angular frequency that breaks the material will be the natural or reasonant frequency of that material. All the different reasonanct frequencies of different materials are tabulated and the material the building is made out of will determine its reasonant frequency. However buildings with many different materials may be more difficult. Would you just average the reasonant frequencies of the materials?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally, that is a very complicated problem. Essentially, you write down the equations governing, e.g., the deflection or bending of the structure based on material properties and response to stress and strain. Often that turns out to be a system of coupled oscillators. Analysis of those equations ultimately leads to characterization of the fundamental modes of oscillation.

Also, scale models of the structure are helpful.
 
Actually it's a bit easier than that. The standard is a rap test or plink test. Essentially one uses a hammer or some other object to induce a stepwise input/impulse to the system. That impulse will excite all the modes in the structure at once. Through the use of FFT algorithms, one can see the natural frequencies as spikes in the output. We use this method for determining and verifying the natural frequencies of complex shapes like stator vanes and turbine or compressor blades. However, like you said, these are individual components and not a complex system like a building.

For something like a building, I can't say for sure that it is useful to try to reduce the system down to the overall building has a natural frequency of xxx Hz. I don't think it works like that. They do test buildings in wind tunnels, but I can't say for sure that they can get a resonant response to correlate from the model to the real thing.
 
pivoxa15 said:
All solids have a natural frequency but how do you determine its value?

How would you determine it for a large building?

I'll guess that for each different material they apply a constant external force with a specific angular frequency. The force with an angular frequency that breaks the material will be the natural or reasonant frequency of that material. All the different reasonanct frequencies of different materials are tabulated and the material the building is made out of will determine its reasonant frequency. However buildings with many different materials may be more difficult. Would you just average the reasonant frequencies of the materials?
The natural frequencies of something like a solid rod can be determined when the length, Young's modulus for the material and the mass density and, for more complicated systems (such as a pipe, building etc.) the structure. I believe you also need to be more specific in that there are natural freuqencies for both longitudinal and compressional waves which generally have different values. The imnportant thing to know is that there is more than one natural frequency.

A nice text on this topic is Vibrations and Waves by A. P. French.

Pete
 
actually there is not ONE frequency of resonance. In general, a structure can vibrate in different ways. say a rod, for example. A rod can BEND with any substantial stretching. to that degree of freedom, correspond a variety of modes, whose frequency are not multiples of the natural frequency, but there is a fundamental frequency involved. The same rod can stretch along it's axis. Frequencies for this degree of freedom are multiples of a fundamental. In the more general case, there are as many fundamentals as degrees of freedom for one particle (translation, rotation,..). A good first approach is to model things with simple geometries (rods, plates,...) to make an estimation, and then rely on finite elements to obtain an accurate prediction of the modes of a complicated geometry
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
959
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K