How Do You Determine When Acceleration Is Zero in Particle Motion Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lihinii
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To determine when the acceleration of a particle is zero, the velocity function v(t) = 20 + 12t² - t³ is analyzed. The acceleration is found by taking the derivative of the velocity, resulting in a(t) = 24t - 3t². Setting the acceleration equal to zero leads to the equation 24t - 3t² = 0. Solving this equation reveals that the acceleration is zero at t = 8 seconds. This calculation is essential for understanding particle motion in physics.
lihinii
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A GCE OL pastpaper question...

Can someone get over this for me please...thanx ie

The velocity, v m/s, of a particle P after t seconds is given by
v = 20 + 12*t[squared] - t[cubed] , t is larger than 0.

Calculate the value of t when the acceleration of P is 0.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
v(t)=20+12t^2-t^3,\;\;t>0

We \;know:\,a(t)=v\prime(t)

a(t)=24t-3t^2=0

t=8\,(sec)
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top