How Do You Ensure Only Fe3+ Ions Are Implanted in a Target?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Panthera Leo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ion
Panthera Leo
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
This question might sound very simple, but I couldn't find a relevant answer by googling;

Assume Fe3+ is to be implanted in some target, how to get the 3+ ions to be implanted and not the 2+ or 1+ ?

Thanks for your contributions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Panthera Leo said:
This question might sound very simple, but I couldn't find a relevant answer by googling;

Assume Fe3+ is to be implanted in some target, how to get the 3+ ions to be implanted and not the 2+ or 1+ ?

Thanks for your contributions.

First, I cannot imagine you implanting iron because it contaminates anything in an implanter that it touches (and it's ferrous).

However, you would need a final energy magnet at an angle that strips any energy contamination from the beam. Your analyzer magnet would do most of that, but you would pick up neutral contaminants (your bigger problem) and those along with the energy contaminants (+ and ++) would be filtered in the FEM.

Hope this helps.

If you are talking about plasma implantation with HV to a target, you cannot control the energy level that well, which is why diffusion style doping is ok for coating substrates, but not for controlling depth of implant or for voltage threshold adjust type applications.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top