How do you explain the CMB anisotropy diagram?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropy diagram, specifically the significance of the multipole moment on the x-axis. Participants express surprise at the physical relevance of high-order multipole moments, such as those reaching 1000. There is a request for clarification on the concept of "opening angle," with values mentioned ranging from 20 to 22. The conversation highlights the complexity of interpreting CMB data and the need for further explanation on specific terms. Understanding these elements is crucial for grasping the implications of the CMB anisotropy in cosmology.
Simfish
Gold Member
Messages
811
Reaction score
2
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/media/070950/070950b.jpg
So the x-axis is multipole moment, which I remember from 2nd-quarter electromagnetism. Anyways, it surprises me that 1000-order multipole moments can even be physically significant.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I got a professor to explain most of it to me. But I still don't get "opening angle". You supposedly can get a value with an "opening angle of 20". Or 21. Or 22.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top