How Do You Find A Central Force Orbit?

AI Thread Summary
To find the orbit of a particle in a central force field using polar coordinates, calculating the Lagrangian and solving the Euler-Lagrange equation is suggested. The discussion highlights that only a few central force laws permit stable closed orbits, primarily those that depend solely on distance. The conversation also touches on the concept of angular dependence in central forces, noting that such forces typically point toward the center but can be influenced by additional masses. The importance of using energy equations for understanding orbits is acknowledged, especially for those not yet familiar with Lagrangian mechanics. Overall, the exploration of orbits in central force fields reveals complexities in both closed and stable orbits.
Chronothread
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
If you are given a central force field and an initial velocity of a particle in this field, how would you go about finding the orbit of the particle in polar coordinates?

Thanks for you help and time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well the easiest way would probably be to calculate the Lagrangian, and then solve the Euler-Lagrange equation in polar coordinates.
 
What exactly do you mean by "finding the orbit of the particle in polar coordinates"? It sounds like you are talking about Keplerian orbital elements.
 
there are only a few central force laws that allow orbits, most do not
 
By orbits you mean "closed orbits" only?
 
LogicalTime said:
there are only a few central force laws that allow orbits, most do not

Any central force that depends on distance only, and not angle, would allow for a circular closed orbit. Or do you mean orbits that are stable against slight perturbations?
 
yes, sry I meant stable closed orbits

how is that lagrangian coming along chrono?
 
Oops, sorry for never replying. I got caught up with work on other things and haven't visited physics forums for a bit.

We were doing some things involving orbits in central force (not necessarily closed) in my mechanics class and I had posted this originally to see if I could get a way to understand the concept. We weren't at Lagrangian stuff yet so I wasn't to use that yet. I eventually ended up using the energy equation of an orbit and a bunch of other energy equations. I still haven't used Lagrangian stuff too much yet, but it definitely seems like it'll be more useful in a situation like this.

And sorry for not replying and thank you for all your responses.
 
Redbelly98 said:
Any central force that depends on distance only, and not angle, would allow for a circular closed orbit. Or do you mean orbits that are stable against slight perturbations?

This is interesting, the idea of a central force with an angular dependence. The definition of a central force means the force vector will always point toward the center, but there is some angular dependence. Physically, when would something experience some kind of force? My first instinct was an angular dependence due to the gravity of some additional mass (such as jupiter), however, this vector component is not necessarily near to being in the radial direction.
 
  • #10
LogicalTime said:
yes, sry I meant stable closed orbits

You only get that with two force laws: k/x^2 and kx.

There's a treatment of this in the first book of Landau and Lifschitz. Like most everything they do, the material is excellent, but quite terse. They also don't hold you hand by giving you a lot of intermediate steps in their derivations.
 
Back
Top