How Do You Find a Unit Vector Orthogonal to Two Given Vectors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kwal0203
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orthogonal Vector
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a unit vector that is orthogonal to two given vectors, u=(1,1,0) and v=(-1,0,1). Participants explore various methods to approach this problem without directly using the cross product.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the properties of the cross product and its direction. Some suggest using dot products to derive equations for an unknown vector (x, y, z) that is orthogonal to the given vectors. There are questions about the implications of the dot product and how to set up the equations correctly.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants providing guidance on how to formulate the problem using dot products. There is a recognition of the need for clarity in notation and the implications of orthogonality in terms of the dot product being zero. Multiple interpretations of the setup are being explored, and some participants are refining their understanding of the relationships between the vectors.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of confusion regarding notation and the representation of vectors, which may affect the clarity of the discussion. Participants are also navigating the constraints of not using certain methods while trying to maintain mathematical rigor.

kwal0203
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find a unit vector that is orthogonal to both u=(1,1,0) and v=(-1,0,1)

Any help appreciated thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you know about the direction of the cross product of two vectors?
 
haruspex said:
What do you know about the direction of the cross product of two vectors?

Yeah, I see where you are going with that but I need to answer the question without using the cross product
 
Ok, so how about supposing the vector is (x, y, z) and obtaining some equations based on dot products?
 
haruspex said:
Ok, so how about supposing the vector is (x, y, z) and obtaining some equations based on dot products?

I could try that, how do I do it?
 
If you take the dot product with each given vector, what should the result be?
 
u\cdot v=(1,1,0)\cdot (-1,0,1)=-1+0+0=-1

u\cdot v=\left \| u \right \|\left \| v \right \|cos\theta

the dot product represents the angle between the vectors, is that correct?
 
No, I meant take the dot product of (x, y, z) (a vector intended to be orthogonal to the two given vectors) with each of them.
 
let x=(x,y,z)

x\cdot u=(x,y,z)\cdot (1,1,0)
x+y=\left \| x \right \|\left \| u \right \|cos\theta=0

x\cdot v=(x,y,z)\cdot (-1,0,1)
z-x=\left \| x \right \|\left \| v \right \|cos\theta=0

x+y=z-x
y=z

something like this?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
I don't understand what u and v represent in there. looks like in the first line they represent (x,y,z) and (1,1,0), and in the second line (x,y,z) and (-1,0,1). But then you deduce an equation based on u and v representing the same in both cases??
If two vectors are orthogonal, what is their dot product?
Edit: It's late here ... and so to bed.
 
  • #11
Whoops, I fixed up the code. Does it look better now?

The dot product of two orthogonal vectors is equal to zero.
 
  • #12
Ah, I figured it out... thanks for your help!
 
  • #13
kwal0203 said:
let x=(x,y,z)
It's confusing to have one symbol mean two different things, so I recommend that you don't use this notation. I'll use ##p=(x,y,z)##.

kwal0203 said:
x\cdot u=(x,y,z)\cdot (1,1,0)
x+y=\left \| x \right \|\left \| u \right \|cos\theta=0
You should write this as
$$0 =p\cdot u=(x,y,z)\cdot (1,1,0) =x+y.$$ No need to mention the angle between the vectors. Also, you're confusing your readers when you put the zero at the end, instead of at the beginning next to ##p\cdot u## which is equal to 0 by definition of p. (Edit: OK, I see that the thing at the end is also obviously equal to zero because the angle between the vectors is ##\pi/2##, but I still prefer to put the zero at the beginning, where no thought is required). You also left out an equality sign.

Similarly,
$$0=p\cdot v =(x,y,z)\cdot (-1,0,1) =-x+z.$$

kwal0203 said:
x+y=z-x
y=z

something like this?
Yes, something like that. But not that. First you threw away useful information from the equalities ##p\cdot u=0## and ##p\cdot v=0##, and then you incorrectly canceled x and -x from what you had left.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K