How do you find the area of a circle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jim1174
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Circle
AI Thread Summary
To find the area of a circle, use the formula A = πr², where r is the radius. The radius is half of the diameter, and π is approximately 3.14. Some confusion arises from using 314 instead of 3.14, as well as from differing interpretations of the formula. It's important to note that the area will vary based on the units used, such as meters or centimeters. Accurate calculations require using the correct value of π and understanding the notation for exponents.
jim1174
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
If you have a circle with a line that divided it in half. The Internet sites say to take the number and cut it in half like if it was 10 you do 314 x 5 x 5. My textbook says to do 314x 10
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you have a circle, you can find its area by:

First: Cutting the circle in half right through the center.
The straight line going from one side of the circle to the opposite end is called its diameter.
Half of this diameter is the distance a straight line makes from the center of the circle to the edge. This half-distance is called the radius.

To find the area of a circle, we can take the number \pi, which is about 3.14, and multiply that by the radius r, and then by the radius again.

This gives you the formula for the area A, of a circle, which is:
A = \pi \times r\times r = \pi r^{2}

Your textbook might be saying r^{2} instead of r\times r.
When the 2 is to the right of the r, and raised up like a little super script, that means you multiply by r two times. It's a bit of mathematical shorthand called an exponent.

As an example, it's easier to write n^{5} than n\times n\times n\times n\times n. Makes life easier in the long run.
 
jim1174 said:
If you have a circle with a line that divided it in half. The Internet sites say to take the number and cut it in half like if it was 10 you do 314 x 5 x 5. My textbook says to do 314x 10

You're writing 314 when it should be 3.14 (314 is 100 times more than 3.14). Also don't forget about the units.

Let's say that you have a big circle on the ground that's 1m in diameter, so it's 0.5m in radius, then the area of the circle is

A=\pi r^2=3.14\times 0.5\times 0.5 = 0.785m^2

Notice the units at the end: m2 which means the area of the circle is a little over 3/4 of a meter squared.
If we instead decided to measure the radius in cm, being 50cm, then our answer is

A=3.14\times 50^2 = 7,850cm^2

Which is the same answer, but with different units.
 
In addition to what others have said, 3.14 is a very poor approximation to ##\pi##. Most scientific calculators these days have a button for ##\pi## that gives this number to 10 or more decimal places.
 
jim1174 said:
If you have a circle with a line that divided it in half. The Internet sites say to take the number and cut it in half like if it was 10 you do 314 x 5 x 5.
Except for the missing decimal point, that is correct. The area of a circle with radius "r" is \pi r^2 where "\pi" is a constant that is, to two decimal places, 3.14.

My textbook says to do 314x 10
The circumference of a circle of diameter "d" is \pi d (or in terms of radius r, 2\pi r). That's probably what your textbook is talking about.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top