How do you finish rearranging the Doppler shift formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on rearranging the Doppler shift formula, specifically addressing the formula Fs=F0(1/1+-(vsource/c). The user initially struggles with the correct arrangement and consistently finds the need to divide their answer by two to achieve the correct value for Vsource. It is identified that the user had reversed the frequency ratio, which affected the sign of their results. Despite correcting the ratio, the user still encounters the issue of needing to divide by two to obtain the accurate answer. Clarification on the reasoning behind this division is sought to better understand the calculations involved.
McWilliams
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



i am using the Doppler shift formula Fs=F0(1/1+-(vsource/c) i can rearrange it to an extent but when i use it to find my answer i i need to divide it by two in order to do it, every time. I would just like to understand why this is, or if i am doing it completely wrong.


The Attempt at a Solution


((Fs/F0)-1)*V(sound)=Vsource
but if i turn it into 2Vsource it comes out that i will get the right answer when i divide it by two to get vsource, so please explain why there is a two there.

Please and thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
McWilliams said:
((Fs/F0)-1)*V(sound)=Vsource
If I understand your symbols, I think you've got the ratio of the frequencies upside down.
 
Yes, thank you, they were reversed, that created my formula to be positive instead of a negative end number, but i still need to divide Vsource by 2 in order to get the correct answer.
 
McWilliams said:
Yes, thank you, they were reversed, that created my formula to be positive instead of a negative end number, but i still need to divide Vsource by 2 in order to get the correct answer.
Show your work, then.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top