How do you integrate the Hopf term in 2+1 dimensions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ian Lovejoy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration Term
Ian Lovejoy
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm reading Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell by A. Zee, which is excellent but it is occasionally difficult to fill in the blanks on one's own.

Once such place is the integration of the Hopf term, which results from integrating out the gauge field in a Lagrangian with a Chern-Simons term in 2+1 dimensional spacetime.

The Hopf term is:

L_{Hopf}=\frac{1}{4\gamma}j_\mu(\frac{\epsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda}\partial_\nu}{\partial^2})j_\lambda

From here we are supposed to be able to define a current j representing one particle at rest at the origin while another particle goes halfway around it. Integrating the above with this current we are supposed to obtain 1/4\gamma. This defines the fractional statistics of the particles in the system.

Except for a factor of 2 the same treatment appears in section II of this document:

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/cond-mat/pdf/9501/9501022v2.pdf

It all seems perfectly straightforward but I'm unable to do the integration. For 1/{\partial^2} I am using:

\int{\frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{-e^{ik(x - y)}}{k^2 + i\epsilon}}

No matter what order I do the integration in, I seem to get either an integral that is impossible to do, or an result that is apparently zero. The book and the above reference seem to imply that the result is easily obtained by plugging in the current into the Lagrangian.

Can anyone give me a hint? It would be much appreciated.

Thanks,
Ian
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First point to be noted: You cannot interchange the two currents. If you could, by antisymmetry of the epsilon tensor, the expression is identically zero.

The way the above makes sense is if the derivatives act on the right hand current.

Now, for a static charge the only nonzero component of the current is the zeroth component.
For one that is moving, something else, say the x or the y component is also nonzero.

Moving halfway around: say it moves on two consecutive sides of a square - first along the x and then along the y direction...

does this help?
 
I'm also stuck on this question, simply can't integrate out a closed form. Anyone succeeded doing it?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top