MHB How Do You Interpret Rowen's Notation in Matrix Rings?

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Louis Rowen's book, "Ring Theory"(Student Edition) ...

I have a problem interpreting Rowen's notation in Section 1.1 Matrix Rings and Idempotents ...

The relevant section of Rowen's text reads as follows:View attachment 6069
View attachment 6070In the above text from Rowen, we read the following:
" ... ... We obtain a more explicit notation by defining the $$n \times n$$ matric unit $$e_{ij}$$ to be the matrix whose $$i-j$$ entry is $$1$$, with all other entries $$0$$.Thus $$( r_{ij} ) = \sum_{i,j =1}^n r_{ij} e_{ij}$$ ; addition is componentwise and multiplication is given according to the rule $$( r_1 e_{ij} ) ( r_2 e_{uv} ) = \delta_{ju} (r_1 r_2) e_{iv} $$

... ... ...
I am having trouble understanding the rule $$( r_1 e_{ij} ) ( r_2 e_{uv} ) = \delta_{ju} (r_1 r_2) e_{iv}$$ ... ...

What are $$r_1$$ and $$r_2$$ ... where exactly do they come from ... ?

Can someone please explain the rule to me ...?To take a specific example ... suppose we are dealing with $$M_2 ( \mathbb{Z} )$$ and we have two matrices ...$$P = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 3 \\ 5 & 4 \end{pmatrix}$$

and

$$Q = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 1 \\ 3 & 3 \end{pmatrix}$$ ...In this specific case, what are $$r_1$$ and $$r_2$$ ... ... and how would the rule in question work ...?
Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am having trouble understanding the rule $$( r_1 e_{ij} ) ( r_2 e_{uv} ) = \delta_{ju} (r_1 r_2) e_{iv}$$ ... ...

What are $$r_1$$ and $$r_2$$ ... where exactly do they come from ... ?
$r_1$ and $r_2$ are numbers, or, more precisely, elements of the ring $R$. They are also coefficients, or coordinates, of a matrix in the basis consisting of $e_{ij}$. If one matrix is $\displaystyle\sum_{i,j=1}^nr^{(1)}_{ij}e_{ij}$ and another is $\displaystyle\sum_{i,j=1}^nr^{(2)}_{ij}e_{ij}$, then when you multiply them, you apply distributivity and get $\displaystyle\sum_{i,j,u,v=1}^nr^{(1)}_{ij}e_{ij}r^{(2)}_{uv}e_{uv}$, and the formula in your quote says how to compute $r^{(1)}_{ij}e_{ij}r^{(2)}_{uv}e_{uv}$.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
$r_1$ and $r_2$ are numbers, or, more precisely, elements of the ring $R$. They are also coefficients, or coordinates, of a matrix in the basis consisting of $e_{ij}$. If one matrix is $\displaystyle\sum_{i,j=1}^nr^{(1)}_{ij}e_{ij}$ and another is $\displaystyle\sum_{i,j=1}^nr^{(2)}_{ij}e_{ij}$, then when you multiply them, you apply distributivity and get $\displaystyle\sum_{i,j,u,v=1}^nr^{(1)}_{ij}e_{ij}r^{(2)}_{uv}e_{uv}$, and the formula in your quote says how to compute $r^{(1)}_{ij}e_{ij}r^{(2)}_{uv}e_{uv}$.
Thanks Evgeny ... your post was very clear ... and most helpfu ...

Peter
 
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...