How do you know which distribution to use for your problem?

sjaguar13
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
If you have a problem that involves some distribution, how do you know which one to use? The ones we covered so far are:
Binomial
Negative Binomial
Hypergeometric
Poisson Distribution
Poisson Process
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't. You either take data and fit the distribution to one of those (and whichever one gives you the least error becomes the working model), or you guess the distribution from say first principles (say if you are a physicist and working on a physical problem).
 
Sometimes you may be able to trace distributions as "precedents" or "dependents" by uisng established analytical relations between distributions. E.g., if two variables are normally distributed, then their sum is also normal, and their quotient is Cauchy. The logarithm of a Normal variable has a Log Normal distribution. And, sometimes you can approximate (distributions approach one another under certain limit conditions, so it may be possible to use a simpler distribution in place of a more complex one).
 
And at some level, you do know. For example, you know whether it's a discrete or a continuous distribution. Also, we know that centain types of "experiments" are associated with certain distributions. Thus, a coin toss is associated with binomial; "consumer choice" is associated with multinomial; the number of balls in each of N boxes is associated with Chi-square; the number of customers arriving "between 9AM and 10AM" is associated wtih Poisson.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Back
Top