How do you mathematically describe wave function overlap?

Zachary Nichols
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Is there a way to mathematically describe the space where wave functions overlap like with how wave functions describe the space a particle could exist. Then if that is possible can you determine the time period at which that overlap will occur.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wave functions from what?
There is nothing special about overlapping wavefunctions.
Zachary Nichols said:
Then if that is possible can you determine the time period at which that overlap will occur.
Sure, just follow the equations of quantum mechanics.
 
Hydrogen orbital wave functions.

also doesn't the overlap of wave functions represent the space at which the particle is in a state of randomness shifting between the two states until we look at the system and the the overlap collapse into one of the wave functions again
 
Normal hydrogen has just one electron. Normally, the electron will be in the ground state, and the other states are empty and do not matter.
Zachary Nichols said:
also doesn't the overlap of wave functions represent the space at which the particle is in a state of randomness shifting between the two states until we look at the system and the the overlap collapse into one of the wave functions again
No.
 
Okay than what does represent that space where a particle is in randomness between two states, because the wave functions only describes the space at which one particle could exist
 
Zachary Nichols said:
also doesn't the overlap of wave functions represent the space at which the particle is in a state of randomness shifting between the two states until we look at the system and the the overlap collapse into one of the wave functions again

As Mfb said - no.

But I suspect you have some misconceptions about what a wavefunction is. The following may be helpful in sorting those out:
http://www.scottaaronson.com/democritus/lec9.html

Thanks
Bill
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top