How do you name nonmetal binary compounds in chemistry nomenclature?

AI Thread Summary
Nonmetal binary compounds are named by stating the first element followed by the second element with a prefix indicating the number of atoms. For example, CO is named carbon monoxide. When hydrogen is involved, prefixes are typically not used; instead, compounds like CH are referred to as carbon hydride. Hydrogen usually acts as a cation in compounds, but when it functions as an anion, it is called a hydride. Understanding these naming conventions is essential for accurately identifying chemical compounds.
GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



my book says that for nonmetal binary compounds that like

you name the first element first than the next element with the proper prefix indicating how many atoms there are of that element

CO
Carbon monoxide

Makes sense but it also says no prefixes are used for hydrogen... I'm not really sure what this means can someone give me an example like

CH

if it even exists and how you would name it would it just be the name of the first element then hydrogen regardless of the subscript on the bottom of the H

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
probably carbon hydrate
 
CH isn't really anything. The hydrogen thing is strange, most molecules will have hydrogen as the cation, which usually goes on the left (H2O, H2O2, HCO3...). If hydrogen is an anion (has a negative charge), it is usually called a hydride.

So, CH would be carbon hydride, NaH would be Sodium Hydride, and so on.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top