How Do You Quantize Spinor Theory in Quantum Field Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jan Paniev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Peskin Schroeder
Jan Paniev
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Problem 3.4e of Peskin & Schroeder Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Quantize the spinor theory of item (a) of this exercise, where the spinor \chi is the first two components of the Dirac spinor (\psi_L). Find a Hermitean Hamiltonian and the correct creation/annihilation operators that diagonalize it.

Homework Equations


The Majorana mass equation for these components \[i\bar{\sigma}\cdot\partial\chi=im\sigma^2\chi^*\]
(item a), the anticommutation relations for the components of the spinor
\[\{\chi_a(x),\chi^\dagger_b(y) \}=\delta_{ab}\delta(\vec{x}-\vec{y})\].

The Attempt at a Solution


Many. The problem is that I cannot find the correct expansions of the fields and the correct normalizations to diagonalize the Hamiltonian. The fact that the equations mix \chi with \chi^\dagger doesn't allow to use the usual methods and I could not find this done in any book. Pointing to a book or a partial/full solution in the internet would already be a great help. General suggestions and tips are also very, very welcome.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're presumably not still working on this, but see Giunti & Kim's Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics & Astrophysics, section 6.2.5. The key is that after writing the Hamiltonian as chi^dagger partial_0 chi, the partial_0 acts both to the left and to the right (which is often skipped over in P&S, which is usually but not always valid). Here, it's important to cancelling the aa and a^dagger a^dagger terms. (Strictly speaking, the Hamiltonian with the partial_0 acting in both directions differs from the Hamiltonian with it acting in one direction by a surface term.)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top