How Do You Rearrange the Equation v = sqrt(2kt/m) to Solve for M?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jim the duke
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To rearrange the equation v = sqrt(2kt/m) to solve for m, begin by squaring both sides to eliminate the square root, resulting in v^2 = 2kt/m. Next, multiply both sides by m to isolate m, yielding m = 2kt/v^2. Clarification on the equation's format is crucial, as misinterpretation can lead to different approaches. Proper use of parentheses is recommended to avoid confusion. The correct manipulation of the equation allows for accurate solving for m.
jim the duke
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Just need some help rearranging this equation to make M the subject, thanks

v = sqrt 2kt / m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by squaring both sides.
 
sqrt v = sqrt 2kt / m
 
m = 2kt / v^2
 
jim the duke said:
Just need some help rearranging this equation to make M the subject,
v = sqrt 2kt / m
rock.freak667 said:
Start by squaring both sides.

jim the duke said:
sqrt v = sqrt 2kt / m
I see two mistakes in what you did:
1. rock.freak667 said to square both sides (not take the square root of both sides).
2. He said to do it to both sides, not just the left side.
 
jim the duke said:
Just need some help rearranging this equation to make M the subject, thanks

v = sqrt 2kt / m
If the problem is v= sqrt(2kt/m) then, yes, start by squaring both sides to get rid of the square root.

If the problem is v= sqrt(2kt)/m, which is the way I first interpreted it, start by multiplying both sides by m.

Please use parentheses to make your meaning clear!
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top