How do you shoot a man out of a cannon?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ShawnD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cannon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics and safety considerations of shooting a person out of a cannon, exploring historical methods, modern techniques, and the physics involved in such acts. It includes theoretical and practical aspects, as well as anecdotal evidence from circus history.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Historical
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference a Mythbusters episode discussing the heat generated when firing projectiles, questioning how a person can be shot from a cannon without suffering burns.
  • Several participants suggest that circus cannons typically use compressed air rather than explosives for launching, with some noting that an explosive flash-pot may be used for visual effect but is separated from the projectile.
  • Historical context is provided regarding the invention of the human cannonball act, with mentions of George Farini and Idelbrando Zacchini, highlighting the evolution of cannon technology and safety measures over time.
  • One participant notes that the use of bungee cords in modern acts may enhance safety and performance, allowing for longer airtime and reducing the risk of injury upon landing.
  • Concerns are raised about the reliability of spring-loaded mechanisms compared to other methods, with some participants expressing curiosity about the mechanics of bungee-assisted launches.
  • Statistics are mentioned regarding the dangers of being a human cannonball, with claims that a significant number have died during performances, prompting discussions about the science involved in ensuring safety.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the methods used in human cannonball acts, with some agreeing on the use of compressed air while others propose alternative mechanisms. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the most effective and safe methods for launching a person from a cannon.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the specifics of safety measures, the physics of propulsion, and the reliability of various launching methods. Participants rely on anecdotal evidence and historical accounts without definitive conclusions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying circus history, performance safety, physics of motion, and the mechanics of projectile motion in entertainment contexts.

ShawnD
Science Advisor
Messages
715
Reaction score
2
On one episode of mythbusters, they tried shooting bullets made of ice, and they found that the heat firing the gun was enough to melt the ice, heat it to boiling, and evaporate all of the water.

Given that a huge amount of heat is released when firing the projectile, how can a man be shot from a cannon without burning him to death?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm pretty sure that circus cannons use a compressed air blast. In any event, there are no explosives involved in the launching. An explosive flash-pot can accompany the launch to make it look like a gunpowder propellant.

edit: Clarification of the above. An explosive can be used for firing, but it will be separated from the 'cannonball' by a piston of some kind.
 
Awesome, thanks. I should have guessed that.
 
Since you're still posting, I assume that you haven't tried it at home yet.
 
Danger said:
Since you're still posting, I assume that you haven't tried it at home yet.

:smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:
 
Danger said:
I'm pretty sure that circus cannons use a compressed air blast. In any event, there are no explosives involved in the launching. An explosive flash-pot can accompany the launch to make it look like a gunpowder propellant.
edit: Clarification of the above. An explosive can be used for firing, but it will be separated from the 'cannonball' by a piston of some kind.
I think it may just be spring loaded with the added effects. Anything actually explosive is going to be unreliable most likely.
 
I did a quick Google to double-check this. The following is a quote from goodbyemag or some such site.

Most circus historians credit the Englishman George Farini with the invention of the human cannonball. In 1877 he presented the exotic and beautiful Zazel as a human cannonball at the Royal Aquarium in Westminster. Zazel subsequently toured with P.T. Barnum’s circus in America. But Farini’s patented, spring-loaded cannon was unreliable and lacked sufficient blasting power.

Human cannoneering fell into desuetude until 1922, when Idelbrando Zacchini, an Italian circus acrobat who had witnessed Farini’s act as a child, revived it. With his sons he created a revolutionary new human cannon that was powered by air. Smoke clouds and a loud charge were merely added for effect. Idelbrando’s sons took turns being blasted out of the cannon. The act was an immediate sensation, and the Zacchini family Circus Olympia toured Europe before huge crowds.

John Ringling, the American circus impresario, spotted the Zacchini family cannonballs at Tivoli Gardens in Copenhagen. He brought the act – and the entire Zachinni family – back to America for the 1929 season. The family settled in Florida. Advances in cannon technology were continuous. Idelbrando’s sons Mario and Emanuel perfected the double human cannon in the early 30s. Altogether, five of Idelbrando’s seven sons were performing projectiles. Mario, the last surviving Zacchini cannonball from that first generation, has died at age 87.

The Zacchini brothers toured with the Ringling circus for several years, then opened their own traveling carnival in 1939. In the carnival they ratcheted up the act, shooting each other at speeds of up to 90 mph, 140 feet in the air, sometimes over two Ferris wheels.

“The net is very small up in the air,” Mario said. “Flying isn’t the hard part; landing in the net is.”

Mario retired after an accident at the World’s Fair in New York in 1940, in which the net collapsed and he broke some ribs and a shoulder.

“I healed pretty fast in those days,” Mario recalled. “I was like a cat, with nine lives. The eighth is gone. This is the ninth. After this one I’m gone.” How right he was.

Mario was also famed as one of the world’s greatest rope twirlers. He could turn a back flip through a lasso. After his retirement he toured the country for many years with his own carnival. The gaucho act was a big draw.

Constantly searching for new thrills for an easily-jaded audience, the Zacchini family developed the X-15 double canon in 1961. They rejoined the Ringling circus in 1966. In some years as many as five Zacchini cannonball acts were touring the states simultaneously. Edmondo Zacchini, one of Mario’s nephews, was the last human projectile in the family. His final flight was on Aug. 29, 1991.

The Zacchini family has bade farewell to the human cannoneering, yet new acts keep coming. Today’s human cannonball is more likely to be propelled by a bungee cord than by a burst of compressed air. But thanks to the visionary Zacchinis the world can still watch a hapless sack of bones sail over a Ferris wheel.

 
Another answer to the title question is, head first.
 
Danger said:
I did a quick Google to double-check this. The following is a quote from goodbyemag or some such site.
That's interesting. I'd have thought the spring board would be more reliable.
 
  • #10
“The net is very small up in the air,” Mario said. “Flying isn’t the hard part; landing in the net is.”
I love this.:smile: :smile: :smile:

Wow. 140 feet into the air, I guess hitting the net to land would be the tough part.
 
  • #11
There's certainly a lot of science that goes into getting the guy on target safely. One of the sites that I checked said that something like half of all human cannonballs have been killed on the job.
Stats, I think that the spring approach just doesn't provide enough impetus to send someone the kind of distance that is needed to keep people entertained. I'm quite curious about how they can accomplish it with the bungee cord mentioned in the last paragraph of my quote.
 
  • #12
Danger said:
There's certainly a lot of science that goes into getting the guy on target safely. One of the sites that I checked said that something like half of all human cannonballs have been killed on the job.
Stats, I think that the spring approach just doesn't provide enough impetus to send someone the kind of distance that is needed to keep people entertained. I'm quite curious about how they can accomplish it with the bungee cord mentioned in the last paragraph of my quote.
I actually saw a brief clip of a human cannonball with a bungee earlier today. It appears as though the person is still "shot" out of the cannon somehow but they have a bungee attached to their back which may be used to keep them aloft longer and probably most importantly to keep them from going splat on the ground in case of a miss fire or something.
I had the picture in my mind originally of someone being pulled out or being on some sort of zip line. In the clip I saw he just had a line attached to his back that looked like it was probably part of a safety harness of some sort.
http://www.ushra.com/thrillActs/articleDetail?id=Article.2004-07-13.5736
Now here's a human cannon ball I'd like to see. No bungees for her.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
15K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
22
Views
4K