How Do You Solve a Coupled Oscillator Problem with Limited Physics Background?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a student struggling with a coupled oscillator problem due to limited physics background and missed instruction. They express frustration over a lack of support from their professor, who deems the problems easy. The student seeks guidance on which equations to use and how to approach the problem. Suggestions include reviewing class notes and external resources on coupled harmonic oscillators. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges faced by students with gaps in foundational knowledge in physics.
jennieblue22
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem statement is given in its entirety in the attachment.


2. Homework Equations / 3. The Attempt at a Solution
Unfortunately, I have no clue where to start. :( I should add that due to extenuating circumstances I've missed quite a bit of physics instruction, that probably would have been necessary to know; my requests for help from the professor yielded no result, as he seems to think the problems are "easy" enough to just work it out - but that's not possible if one isn't even sure of which equations to start with, and/or why they should be used.

Any and all help would be appreciated. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2011-09-18 at 7.23.04 PM.png
    Screen shot 2011-09-18 at 7.23.04 PM.png
    17.9 KB · Views: 492
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem does say as discussed in class, did you at least get notes from someone?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top