How Do You Solve a Wave Equation Using Separation of Variables?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Precursor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Wave equation
Precursor
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

2nrq1x2.png
The attempt at a solution

I'm using the method of separation of variables by first defining the solution as u(x,t) =X(x)T(t)

Putting this back into the PDE I get: T''X = x^{2}X''T + xX'T

which is simplified to \frac{T''}{T} = \frac{x^{2}X'' + xX'}{X} = -\lambda^{2}

The spatial problem is then: x^{2}X'' + xX' = -X\lambda^{2}

Is this correct so far? How do I continue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is correct. You proceed, of course, by solving that equation, together with the boundary conditions X(1)= 0, X(e)= 0.

(Those boundary conditions follow from u(t, 1)= T(t)X(1)= 0 and u(t, e)= T(t)X(e)= 0. If T(t) is not identically 0, which would not satisfy the initial conditions, then X(1)= X(e)= 0.)

(An obvious solution is the trivial X(x)= 0. But then you could not satisfy the initial conditions. \lambda must be such that the equation has non-trivial solutions- i.e. eigenvalues.)
 
Precursor said:
Homework Statement

2nrq1x2.png



The attempt at a solution

I'm using the method of separation of variables by first defining the solution as u(x,t) =X(x)T(t)

Putting this back into the PDE I get: T''X = x^{2}X''T + xX'T

which is simplified to \frac{T''}{T} = \frac{x^{2}X'' + xX'}{X} = -\lambda^{2}

The spatial problem is then: x^{2}X'' + xX' = -X\lambda^{2}

Is this correct so far? How do I continue?

Looking at the boundary conditions, the substitution X(x) = Z(\log (x)) looks helpful.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top