How Do You Solve an Oscillating Rope Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tigers4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillating Rope
AI Thread Summary
The oscillating rope problem involves a rope under a tension of 120 N, fixed at both ends, displaying a second-harmonic standing wave pattern. The displacement equation provided allows for calculations of the rope's length, wave speed, mass, and period of oscillation in a third-harmonic pattern. Key points include identifying the number of nodes in the second harmonic, which are located at the ends and the midpoint of the rope. To solve the problem, plotting the displacement function can help visualize the nodes. Understanding these concepts is essential for approaching the calculations effectively.
tigers4
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rope, under tension of 120 N and fixed at both ends, oscillates in a second-harmonic standing wave pattern. The displacement of the rope is given by
y = (1.18 m)sin ( x / 2) sin (10 t),
where x = 0 at one end of the rope, x is in meters, and t is in seconds.

(a) What is the length of the rope?

(b) What is the speed of the waves on the rope?

(c) What is the mass of the rope?

(d) If the rope oscillates in a third-harmonic standing wave pattern, what will be the period of oscillation?



Homework Equations


v=sqrt(t/density)
d=m/v


The Attempt at a Solution



I have no clue how to start this problem, can anyone provide a way to approach a problem like this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does the second harmonic look like? Specifically, how many nodes are there and where are they located on the string?
 
the second harmonic has three nodes
 
Last edited:
Right, there are nodes at the ends of the string and one right in the middle. Now try plotting y vs. x and seeing where its zeros are. Those zeros correspond to the nodes on the string.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top