How do you solve degeneracy for 2-D particle in a box?

AI Thread Summary
The degeneracy of the energy level E = 65 E0 for a two-dimensional particle in a box is determined by finding the combinations of positive integers n_x and n_y that satisfy the equation n_x^2 + n_y^2 = 130. The approach involves identifying all pairs of integers that meet this condition, with examples including (9, 7) and (7, 9), indicating at least a degeneracy of 2. The problem can be solved effectively using a guess and test method due to the small integers involved. Ultimately, the key to solving the degeneracy lies in counting all valid solutions to the equation. The discussion highlights the mathematical nature of the problem and the straightforward methods for arriving at the answer.
PhuongV
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the degeneracy of the energy level E =65 E0 of the two dimensional particle in a box?
Answer

Homework Equations



E=(h_^2/8mL^2)*(nx^2+ny^2)--> I think we use this eq.


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I can tell, it's basically a mathematical question - you need to find the number of combinations of integers n1 and n2 such that n12 + n22 = 65 * 2 (I think the 2 should be there since for the ground state energy n1 = n2 = 1).
 
Assuming E0 is the zero point energy, you need to determine how many solutions there are to the equation

E_0 \left(\frac{8mL^2}{h^2}\right) = n_x^2 + n_y^2 = 2(65)

where n_x and n_y are positive integers. For example, one solution would be n_x = 9 and n_y = 7, so obviously n_x = 7 and n_y = 9 is also a solution, so the degeneracy is at LEAST 2. You just need to find all possible solutions, and then count them.

Fortunately the guess and test method works easily for this problem. You could solve it graphically, but the integers are so small I think it's easier to just guess here.
 
Thank you everyone! I figured it out some time ago! I was just not thinking at the time :)
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top