How Do You Solve H(T) at 1 MeV in Cosmology?

Labboi
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Find H(T)
Relevant Equations
H^2 = 8πG/3 *ρR = 4π^3G/ 45 g∗*T^4
Here's the problem:

It is more common to define the “effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom” by writing the total radiation energy as ρR = ργ + ρν + ρe± = (π^2/30) g∗*T^4 , where g∗ = 2 + 7/8(6 + 4) = 43/4 . (1.52) With this, the expansion rate during the radiation era is given by H^2 = 8πG/3 *ρR = 4π^3G/ 45 g∗*T^4. Therefore, when we calculate the expansion rate during the radiation era, we must be careful about how many relativistic degrees of freedom we have in the universe at a given time. For g∗ = 43/4, we obtain 1/H(T) = 1.48 1 (MeV/T^2) sec. (1.54) As the age of the universe during the radiation era is t = 1/(2H), we also have t = 1 2H(T) = 0.74 1 MeV T 2 sec

I don't see how he get's the 1.48. I'm trying to solve H(T) at 1 MeV. But I can't seem to get the right number. When I plug in the numbers I get 5.44.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums!

Labboi said:
I don't see how he get's the 1.48.

Who or what is "he"? Please give the reference from which this is taken.

Labboi said:
When I plug in the numbers I get 5.44.

Please show your work.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top