How Do You Solve These Logarithm Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kjos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Home Logarithm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving three logarithmic equations, with participants seeking clarification on the notation and methods. The equations include substitutions and transformations, particularly using z = lg x for simplification. There is confusion regarding the meaning of "lg," which is clarified to refer to logarithms, likely base 10. Participants emphasize the importance of specifying logarithm bases due to varying conventions in mathematical literature. Ultimately, the correct solutions for the equations are shared, highlighting the need for clear communication in mathematical expressions.
Kjos
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



i.2(lgx)^2 - lgx = 0

and

ii. lg(2x-2)^2= 4lg(1-x)

and

iii. lgx-6 / lgx-4 = lgx.

I simply do not manage to solve these equations, and I would therefore be happy for all help. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hints:

i) and iii) Make the substitution z = lg x, and solve for z. What do you get?

ii) Notice that: lg (2x - 2) = lg[(-2)(1 - x)]. Now, if lg represents a principal value of the logarithm with a branch cut along the negative real axis, then:

<br /> \mathrm{lg} \left[(-2)(1 - x) \right] = \mathrm{lg}(e) \cdot \ln{\left[(-2)(1-x) \right]} = \left\lbrace<br /> \begin{array}{ll}<br /> \mathrm{lg}(e) \cdot [\ln(2) + \ln(1-x)] = \mathrm{lg}(2) + \mathrm{lg}(1 - x) &amp;, \ \mathrm{Arg}(1-x) \le 0 \\<br /> <br /> \mathrm{lg}(e) \cdot [\ln(2) + \ln(1-x) - 2 \pi \, i] = \mathrm{lg}(2) + \mathrm{lg}(1 - x) - 2 \pi \, \mathrm{lg}(e) \, i &amp;, \ \mathrm{Arg}(1-x) &gt; 0<br /> \end{array}\right.<br />

Then, substitute z = lg(1 - x) and solve the equsation for z. Make sure that the condition for Arg(1 - x) is satisfied in the proper case.
 
Dickfore said:
Hints:

ii) Notice that: lg (2x - 2) = lg[(-2)(1 - x)]. Now, if lg represents a principal value of the logarithm with a branch cut along the negative real axis, then:

<br /> \mathrm{lg} \left[(-2)(1 - x) \right] = \mathrm{lg}(e) \cdot \ln{\left[(-2)(1-x) \right]} = \left\lbrace<br /> \begin{array}{ll}<br /> \mathrm{lg}(e) \cdot [\ln(2) + \ln(1-x)] = \mathrm{lg}(2) + \mathrm{lg}(1 - x) &amp;, \ \mathrm{Arg}(1-x) \le 0 \\<br /> <br /> \mathrm{lg}(e) \cdot [\ln(2) + \ln(1-x) - 2 \pi \, i] = \mathrm{lg}(2) + \mathrm{lg}(1 - x) - 2 \pi \, \mathrm{lg}(e) \, i &amp;, \ \mathrm{Arg}(1-x) &gt; 0<br /> \end{array}\right.<br />

This is the only one I can't figure out. Isn't there an easier way?
 
First of all, what do you mean by "lg"? Second, what is the domain in which you solve this equations? Is it complex numbers, or are you restricted to real numbers only?
 
Dickfore said:
First of all, what do you mean by "lg"? Second, what is the domain in which you solve this equations? Is it complex numbers, or are you restricted to real numbers only?


Lg = Logarithm
Real numbers only, but no worries, I think I worked it out.

Thanks!
 
Kjos said:

Homework Statement



i.2(lgx)^2 - lgx = 0

and

ii. lg(2x-2)^2= 4lg(1-x)

and

iii. lgx-6 / lgx-4 = lgx.

I simply do not manage to solve these equations, and I would therefore be happy for all help. Thanks in advance.

(ii) Is ambiguous. Do you mean
[lg(2x-2)]^2 = 4 lg(1-x), or do you mean
lg[(x-2)^2] = 4 lg(1-x)?

(iii) As written, (iii) is
(lg x) - (6/lg x) - 4 = lg x. Did you mean that? Or, did you mean
lg(x-1)/lg(x-4) = lg x? Or did you mean
[lg(x-1)/lg x] - 4 = lg x?

You need to use brackets to make things clear.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
(ii) Is ambiguous. Do you mean
[lg(2x-2)]^2 = 4 lg(1-x), or do you mean
lg[(x-2)^2] = 4 lg(1-x)?

(iii) As written, (iii) is
(lg x) - (6/lg x) - 4 = lg x. Did you mean that? Or, did you mean
lg(x-1)/lg(x-4) = lg x? Or did you mean
[lg(x-1)/lg x] - 4 = lg x?

You need to use brackets to make things clear.

RGV

My mistake. Check the link. http//bildr.no/view/1297631
 
Last edited:
Kjos said:
My mistake. [PLAIN]http://bildr.no/view/1297631[/QUOTE]

So, what are the answers to the questions I asked? Also, someone asked you what "lg" represents, and you said "logarithm". But, there are three kinds of logarithms most commonly used : (i) logarithms to base 2; (ii) logarithms to base 10; and (ii) natural logarithms. Just saying "logarithm" does not really help us; you need to specify what type of logarithm you mean.

RGV
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ray Vickson said:
So, what are the answers to the questions I asked? Also, someone asked you what "lg" represents, and you said "logarithm". But, there are three kinds of logarithms most commonly used : (i) logarithms to base 2; (ii) logarithms to base 10; and (ii) natural logarithms. Just saying "logarithm" does not really help us; you need to specify what type of logarithm you mean.

RGV

I don't know actually, but I think it is logarithms to base 10.

And regarding you question, please check out the link attached above.

The correct answers are:

iii. X = 1000 or X = 100

ii. x =-1

However, it is not that important since I've got until monday.
 
  • #10
If the symbol is given as logx it is the default one, with the base of 10. In other cases you have the logarithm given as lognX - where n is the base and it is equal to log10X/log10n and finally you have the natural logarithm ln X which has a base of e - so ln X = logeX. Hope that clarifies it for you :)
 
  • #11
lendav_rott said:
If the symbol is given as logx it is the default one, with the base of 10. In other cases you have the logarithm given as lognX - where n is the base and it is equal to log10X/log10n and finally you have the natural logarithm ln X which has a base of e - so ln X = logeX. Hope that clarifies it for you :)

Unfortunately, what you say is not completely correct: many authors use log x to mean ln x, etc., so you really do need to check. Often if one wants to use a base other than e, one uses a subscript like log10(x) or log2(x) or an index notation like log[10](x), etc. I think usage has changed a lot during the more than 50 years since I was in school; then log(x) really did always mean log[10](x). Now, not so much.

RGV
 
Back
Top