How Do You Solve This Complex Exponential Equation for x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter adc85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stuck
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a complex exponential equation for x, specifically the equation (e^10-11)^-1*(-e^(10-x)-e^10-x) = p. The initial attempts involve manipulating the equation and applying logarithms, but the solver encounters difficulties and doubts the possibility of an explicit solution. It is suggested that the equation is transcendental, indicating that analytical solutions may not exist. Graphical methods are recommended to find potential intersection points, but one participant reports no intersections were found, leading to frustration with the complexity of the course material. The overall sentiment reflects a struggle with Calculus-Based Statistics, emphasizing its challenging nature.
adc85
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Trying to solve for x here...

(e^10-11)^-1*(-e^(10-x)-e^10-x) = p

So I try:

(-e^(10-x)-e^10-x) = (e^10-11)p
e^(10-x) = -(e^10-11)p-e^10-x
ln(e^(10-x)) = ln(-(e^10-11)p-e^10-x)
10-x = ln(-(e^10-11)p-e^10-x)

I get stuck there and don't know what to do. Any help appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think this can be explicitly solved for x.
 
Typically a transcendental equation, no analytical methods to find a solution, if any. Best method, either find it through a graphical method (plot 2 graphs and the solution to your problem is/are the intersection point(s), if any.

Daniel.
 
I graphed the left side of the equation and then graphed the other side (p being X). They do not intersect anywhere. Guess my CDF (Cumulative Distribution Function) is wrong.

Ug and to think I got straight A's in all other Math courses so far. This one is just ridiculous. Never take Calculus-Based Statistics unless you have to for your major.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top