How Do You Solve w=0.5(z+1/z) for Complex w?

Macarenses
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How does one prove that for w≠+-1 , w a complex number, there are exactly 2 solutions to the equation w=0.5(z+1/z)? I'm at a total loss here. Could someone clue me in on this one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Macarenses said:
How does one prove that for w≠+-1 , w a complex number, there are exactly 2 solutions to the equation w=0.5(z+1/z)? I'm at a total loss here. Could someone clue me in on this one?
What if you multiplied each side by 2z?
 
Last edited:
The best way to prove there are two solutions is to find them! That is what ramsey2879 is suggesting.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The best way to prove there are two solutions is to find them! That is what ramsey2879 is suggesting.
I do believe that the quadratic formula will work for equations with complex coefficients even if it is not clear (at least to me) how to find the square root of a complex number. Just write the solution out in the radical form simplified as far as posible.
 
Do a internet search: complex numbers solve square root
 
w=0.5(z+1/z)
w=0.5z+0.5/z
wz=0.5z^2+0.5
0.5z^2+0.5-wz=0

If you could substitute a value of either w or z you could work out the other using Quadratic Formula

x = (-b +- sqrt(b^2-4ac))/2a

Other than this, I can't see how you solve it since you have 2 unknowns. Either way you have a squared value for z so z has 2 solutions.

Sorry if I was no help, this is my first post here as I just joined today. :)
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top