How Does a Bowling Ball's Speed Change Down an Incline?

AI Thread Summary
A 30kg bowling ball starts from rest at a 1.5m incline, and the discussion focuses on calculating its translational speed at the bottom using conservation of energy principles. The equation mgh = 1/2Iw^2 is proposed, substituting the moment of inertia for a solid sphere. Clarifications are made regarding the distinction between translational speed and the total kinetic energy, which includes both translational and rotational components. The correct approach involves understanding that translational speed refers to the speed of the center of mass. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the principles of kinetic energy in the context of rolling motion.
BoldKnight399
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
A 30kg bowling ball with a radius of 11 cm starts from rest at the top of an incline 1.5m in height. Find the translational speed of the bowling ball after it has rolled to the bottom of the incline. (assume that the ball is a uniform solid sphere) acceleration of gravity is 9.81m/s^2. Answer in units of m/s. (I=2/5mr^2)
so I was thinking of treating this as a simple conservation of energy question, just substituting I and w for kinetic energy.
mgh=1/2Iw^2
mgh=1/2(2/5mr^2)(v/r)^2
so:
mgh=2/10mrv^2

I think that this works, but to be honest, I don't understand what translational speed is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi BoldKnight399! :smile:

(have an omega: ω and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
BoldKnight399 said:
… I was thinking of treating this as a simple conservation of energy question, just substituting I and w for kinetic energy.
mgh=1/2Iw^2
mgh=1/2(2/5mr^2)(v/r)^2

No, KE of a rotating object is rotational KE plus ordinary KE (ie as if all the mass was moving with the velocity of the centre of mass) …

1/2 Iω2 + 1/2 mv2 :wink:

(And translational speed or velocity is simply the speed or velocity of the centre of mass)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top