How Does a Coaxial Cable's Capacitance Change with Different Configurations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the capacitance of a coaxial cable with two dielectrics and the effect of adding an ungrounded metal shell. The original capacitance formula needs modification to account for the two dielectric layers, requiring the derivation of electric fields and voltage differences. For the second problem involving a charged spherical shell above a grounded plate, the method of images simplifies the calculation by treating it as two oppositely charged spheres. Gauss's law is applied to find the electric field for each sphere, and superposition is used to determine the total field. The conversation highlights the challenges posed by the textbook's complexity and seeks additional resources for better understanding.
bdubb427
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Help please w/ the following questions

Homework Statement



1.
A coaxial cable is given with two concentrically placed dielectrics. What is the capacitance of this structure? If an ungrounded metal shell is placed at a certain distance from the inner electrode, what will be the capacitance now? Plot the magnitude of field and potential as a function of radius in both cases.


Homework Equations


C = Q / V = [2 * pi * epsilon * length] / [ln(b/a)] where b is the radius of the entire cable (outer and inner conductor) and a is the radius of just the inner conductor


Homework Statement


2. A charged spherical shell is placed 1m above a ground metal plate. Find electric field.

Homework Equations


besides coulomb's law, i don't have any other relevant equations for this.


Our textbook is really hard to understand, and the examples given in the text are even harder to follow. the book is Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics by Ulaby.. Any suggestions for another book are nice, but my exam is coming up and finding another book is just not an option at this point. Please help if u can. thank you...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For problem 1, you have four layers: a charged conducting cylinder, an inner dielectric layer, an outer dielectric layer, and an outer conducting shell. Because you have two dielectrics, the equation you provided (with just one epsilon) won't work. You'll need to rederive that expression for two dielectrics. I believe this would require a.) finding the electric field in the presence of a dielectric, which might be as simple as switching epsilon_0 with epsilon_1 in region 1 and epsilon_2 in region 2 (however you decide to label them); b.) calculating the voltage differences between the boundaries from the electric fields; and c.) calculating Q/V. I am not sure if adding in a thin metal shell would make any difference.

The second question seems much easier. First, with the method of images we know that this problem is equivalent to one where we have two spheres with opposite charges which are 2m apart. Gauss's law gives you the E-field for each sphere in the absence of the other sphere, and by the superposition principle you just add their fields to get the total.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top