How Does a Conducting Bar on Rails Behave in a Magnetic Field?

AI Thread Summary
A conducting bar on rails experiences forces due to a magnetic field, leading to a differential equation for its velocity. The initial speed of the bar is 64.0 m/s, and it is subjected to a magnetic field of 1.3 T with a resistance of 30.0 Ohms. The discussion emphasizes the need to set up the correct differential equation, which relates the force to the current and magnetic field. Participants clarify that the integration process must be approached carefully, as previous assumptions about constants and variables were incorrect. The focus remains on accurately deriving the expression for the bar's velocity over time.
krh68
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A conducting bar of length L = 21.2 cm and mass M = 60.0 g lies across a pair of conducting rails. The contact friction between the bar and the rails is negligible, but there is a resistor at one end with a value R = 30.0 Ohms. Initially the rod is given an initial speed of v0 = 64.0 meters per second. There is a uniform magnetic field perpendicular to the plane containing the rod and rails of magnitude B = 1.3 T.
What is the speed of the rod at time t = 26.068 s?

I know:
v=v0 + at
F=ma
F=iLB
i=(emf)/R
emf = dflux/dt
flux = BA

I know I need to solve for the area to get the flux and the length (L) is constant while the width is changing but I don't understand how to get the integral or set up the integral for the width. Please help ASAP.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
v = v0+at is out of the picture. This is not a constant acceleration situation. All your other equations are relevant.
You need to set up a differential equation and solve it. Start with

F = m (dv/dt)

Replace F with iLB and then replace i with (1/R)(dΦ/dt). The expression for dΦ/dt is proportional to v. So you end up with the differential equation that is essentially

dv/dt = (const)v

You should be able to find what "const" is and to integrate the above equation.
 
Okay, so dv/dt = v(const) or dv/dt = v(LB/mR)
I still don't know how to solve for v.
When I integrate dv/dt, do I get r(LB/mR)? and if so, what is r?
 
krh68 said:
Okay, so dv/dt = v(const) or dv/dt = v(LB/mR)
This is incorrect. Please show how you got it, then I can point out where you went wrong.
I still don't know how to solve for v.
Worry about that later. First get the correct expression for dv/dt.
When I integrate dv/dt, do I get r(LB/mR)?
No, you do not.
and if so, what is r?
I don't know, but r it appears in your expression above. You made it up so you should know what it represents.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top