How Does a Crate's Impact Translate to Spring Compression?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackout85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the impact of a 1.5kg crate falling from a height of 2.0m onto a spring scale with a spring constant of 1.5 X 10^5 N/m. The potential energy of the crate is determined to be 30J, while the weight of the crate is calculated as 14.75 N. It is noted that the force exerted on the spring can be derived using Hooke's law (F = kx) and the conservation of energy principle. The initial potential energy is equal to the elastic potential energy stored in the spring at maximum compression. The discussion emphasizes solving for the compression distance (x) and the corresponding force.
blackout85
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
A 1.5kg crate falls from a height of 2.0m onto an industrial spring scale with a spring constant of 1.5 X 10^5 N/m. At its greatest compression the reading on the scale is:

My work:

mgh= PE
(1.5kg*9.81m/s*2.0m)= 30J
The potential energy of the crate is 30J
The Force of the crate is 1.5kg* 9.81m= 14.75
Would the force of the crate be equal to the force of compression

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
blackout85 said:
A 1.5kg crate falls from a height of 2.0m onto an industrial spring scale with a spring constant of 1.5 X 10^5 N/m. At its greatest compression the reading on the scale is:

My work:

mgh= PE
(1.5kg*9.81m/s*2.0m)= 30J
The potential energy of the crate is 30J
The Force of the crate is 1.5kg* 9.81m= 14.75
Would the force of the crate be equal to the force of compression

Thank you
You missed the spring part. The weight of the crate is 14.75 N, but the force on the spring is, per Hookes law, F =kx.
One way to solve for x is to use the conservation of energy principle, noting that initial energy (which is just potential) is equal to final energy (which is just the spring (stored) elastic potential energy , 1/2kx^2. (There is no kinetic energy in the initaial or final case). Try to solve for x, then F.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top