How does a magnetic field perform no work?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of work done by a magnetic field on a moving charge, exploring the relationship between force, displacement, and energy. Participants are examining the conditions under which work is defined and how it applies to magnetic forces, particularly in the context of charged particles moving in magnetic fields.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of work and its relation to kinetic energy, questioning whether a force must change kinetic energy to qualify as doing work. Some explore the implications of the force being perpendicular to velocity, while others delve into the mathematical relationships involving vectors and dot products.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored regarding the nature of work done by magnetic fields. Some participants have offered guidance on definitions and mathematical relationships, while others are seeking clarification on specific points and the implications of the equations presented.

Contextual Notes

There are references to textbook definitions and the work-energy theorem, indicating that participants are encouraged to consult their resources. The discussion also highlights the need for a better understanding of the underlying physics concepts and assumptions related to magnetic fields and forces.

mahrap
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
1. I understand that in order for a force to qualify as doing work it must displace an object. The magnetic field does indeed induce a "force" on a moving charge and displaces the moving charge toward a different trajectory. However, it does not change the kinetic energy of the moving charge. So for something to qualify to do work must it also change the kinetic energy of the object? I guess what I really need is a better definition of work and how it relates to force. Please guide me in any way you can. Thanks for all the help.

2. F = q (v x B)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the force is always perpendicular to velocity, then no work is done, a change in direction, but not a change in speed.
 
You should be able to find answers to your questions in your textbook. You probably paid a lot of good money for it, so you should make use of it! What is the definition of work? What does the work-energy theorem tell you?
 
I like to think of work as transferring energy via a force. In your particular case, if a charged particle is moving parallel to magnetic field lines then no work would be done because, as you said, there would be no change in energy of the particle and consequently no work done.
 
mahrap said:
The magnetic field does indeed induce a "force" on a moving charge and displaces the moving charge toward a different trajectory.

But consider the total, instantaneous displacement of the charge. It's moving, don't forget. So you can find this infinitesimal displacement, \vec {ds} by by finding the distance traveled over the infinitesimal time, dt. Don't forget, \vec {ds} is a vector and it has a direction.

Now ask yourself, knowing what you know about magnetic fields, what is the that vector's direction with respect to the direction of the magnetic force, \vec f?

[Edit: bonus hint: how does the charge's instantaneous velocity \vec v relate to \vec {ds} and dt?]

I guess what I really need is a better definition of work and how it relates to force. Please guide me in any way you can. Thanks for all the help.

Work is defined as

W = \vec f \cdot \vec {s}
or in the case of a varying force, or force with a varying direction,
W = \int_{s=a}^b \vec f \cdot \vec {ds}

Notice that in both cases, there is a dot product involved. (It's not as simple as just multiplying the magnitudes together.) What does that dot product tell you about the work done by magnetic fields, given what you've just found about the charge's displacement and the direction of magnetic force?
 
Last edited:
rpthomps said:
I like to think of work as transferring energy via a force. In your particular case, if a charged particle is moving parallel to magnetic field lines then no work would be done because, as you said, there would be no change in energy of the particle and consequently no work done.
The relative direction of the mag field compared to the direction of the particle velocity is immaterial. A mag field produces no work on a moving charge, period. Reason? (v x B)*v = 0 always. Algebraic identity. * means dot-product.
 
rude man said:
The relative direction of the mag field compared to the direction of the particle velocity is immaterial. A mag field produces no work on a moving charge, period. Reason? (v x B)*v = 0 always. Algebraic identity. * means dot-product.

Can you parse what you said a little more? First, why is this equation (v x B)*v = 0 relevant? And secondly, if no work is done by the mag field then where does the energy come from?
 
qv x B is force. v is rate of change of displacement. So (qv x B)*v is power. Algebraically, this is always zero since v is always orthogonal to v x B.

The energy of the particle is imparted to it by some other force, usually an electric field. Never by a B field.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rpthomps
rude man said:
qv x B is force. v is rate of change of displacement. So (qv x B)*v is power. Algebraically, this is always zero since v is always orthogonal to v x B.

The energy of the particle is imparted to it by some other force, usually an electric field. Never by a B field.

Okay. Thanks for your response and your time.
 
  • #10
rpthomps said:
Okay. Thanks for your response and your time.
10-4.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K