How Does a Magnetic Field Possess Angular Momentum?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of angular momentum conservation in the context of a magnet moving through a conductive disk, as described by Feynman. It raises questions about how the magnetic field can possess angular momentum, particularly when the induced current causes the disk to spin, seemingly creating angular momentum from nothing. Participants suggest that the system is not isolated due to the induced current, which involves work against a force acting on the magnet. The conversation also touches on the complexities of electromagnetic fields carrying energy and momentum, and the existence of "hidden" momentum in static fields. Overall, the topic highlights ongoing debates in classical physics regarding the interactions between magnets and charges.
SpitfireAce
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
I was reading Feynman's "Character of Physical Law" and in it he discusses how conservation of angular momentum is seemingly broken when you take a magnet and bring it through the center of a conductive disk... there is an induced electrical current and if the disk was on wheels it would spin... angular momentum from nothing... after that he says that the angular momentum actually is conserved because the magnetic field has an angular momentum of opposite spin... I didn't get this explanation, the magnetic field lines would curl in the same direction as the disk's spin right? how can a field have an angular momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess would be that by bringing the magnet through the disk, a current is induced so that a force acts against the movement of the magnet. Moving the magnet through the disk thus involves some work against this force, and the system is therefore not isolated. Laws of conservation usually presuppose an isolated system, and thus do not apply here.

As I said, it is only my guess, though it might prove equivalent to the explanation you quote.
 
I suppose that the phenomenon Feynman was referring to has to do with "back EMF," which in the case of a motor may maintain the relative rotation between its armature and the magnetic field driving it.
 
E-M fields carry both energy and momentum. The momentum density field points in the same direction as the Poynting vector (E cross H), and there can be angular momentum in the fields as well.

David Griffiths has some great examples in his Intro to Electrodynamics if you have access to that.
 
SpitfireAce said:
I was reading Feynman's "Character of Physical Law" and in it he discusses how conservation of angular momentum is seemingly broken when you take a magnet and bring it through the center of a conductive disk... there is an induced electrical current and if the disk was on wheels it would spin... angular momentum from nothing... after that he says that the angular momentum actually is conserved because the magnetic field has an angular momentum of opposite spin... I didn't get this explanation, the magnetic field lines would curl in the same direction as the disk's spin right? how can a field have an angular momentum?

There are lot of controversies in classical explanations of interactions between magnets and charges. For example, these explanations require that static electric and magnetic fields have non-zero momentum and angular momentum. Moreover, they lead to the notions of "hidden" linear and angular momentum in material bodies. Take a look at the following papers (and numerous references therein), where authors painfully try to make sense of these ideas:

S. Coleman, J. H. Van Vleck, "Origin of "hidden momentum" force on magnets", Phys. Rev. 171 (1968), 1370

W. H. Furry, "Examples of momentum distribution in the electromagnetic field and in matter", Am. J. Phys. 37 (1969), 621.

R. H. Romer, "Angular momentum of static electromagnetic fields", Am. J. Phys. 34 (1966), 772

G. Spavieri, G. T. Gillies, "Fundamental tests of electrodynamic theories: Conceptual investigations of the Trouton-Noble and hidden momentum effects", Nuovo Cim. B 118 (2003), 205.

Eugene.
 
Last edited:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top