How Does a Man Walking on a Merry-Go-Round Affect Its Motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter asafbuch
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physics of a man walking on the edge of a merry-go-round, focusing on angular momentum and the effects of friction. The man moves with a constant velocity, raising questions about the angular velocity of the merry-go-round and the angle it rotates when the man completes a cycle. Participants explore the implications of conservation of angular momentum, noting that if no external torque is present, angular momentum remains conserved. The conversation highlights the distinction between external and internal torques, clarifying that friction between the man and the merry-go-round does not affect the overall angular momentum. Theoretical understanding of these principles is essential for solving the posed problems.
asafbuch
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1. A man with mass m walks with a constant velocity v with respect to the ground on the edge of a marry-go-round that has a radius of R and moment of inertia I. The system starts from rest.
a) what is the angular velocity of the marry-go-round?
b) when the man completes a full cycle (returns to its initial position) at what angle did the marry-go-round rotate?
c)what is the friction coefficient between the man and the marry-go-round for the man not to get off the marry-go-round?




2. No relevant equations.



3. I tried to use conservation of angular momentum and got this:
I\omega+mR2v/R=0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi asafbuch! welcome to pf! :smile:

(have an omega: ω and btw it's "merry-go-round" :wink:)
asafbuch said:
3. I tried to use conservation of angular momentum and got this:

that's right!

so ω = … ? :smile:
 
I thought so... but shouldn't there be any torque?

If there is a conservation of angular momentum than there is no torque acting on the marry-go-round, means there is no friction between the man and the marry-go-round...
but if there is a torque (and thus a friction) than you don't have a constant angular velocity...

whats wrong with the theory?
 
hi asafbuch! :wink:

there will be conservation of angular momentum about any point if there is no external torque about that point …

the external friction is at the centre (and so has zero torque about the centre), so angular momentum will be conserved about the centre :smile:

(the friction between the man and the merry-go-round is an internal torque, so it doesn't matter :wink:)
 
oh, thank you tiny-tim!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top