How Does a Particle Behave in a One-Dimensional Delta Potential?

skrat
Messages
740
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


A particle is moving in a one-dimensional potential $$V(x)=-\lambda \delta (x)$$ where ##\lambda >0##. Calculate
a) Expected value and uncertainty of particle energy.
b) At ##t=0## we measure the position of the particle. What is the probability that the particle has ##|x|>\frac{\hbar ^2}{m\lambda }## right after the measurement?
c) At ##t=0## we measure the energy of the particle. What are possible results and their probabilities?
d) What if we do all those measurements at ##t>0##?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Let us firstly find that wavefunction:
Before the Delta function we expect something like ##\psi _1=A e^{ikx}## and after ##\psi _2=Ae^{-ikx}##.

Boundary condition $$\psi (-0)=\psi (+0)$$ eliminates all odd functions while the second boundary condition $${\psi (+0)}'-{\psi (-0)}'=-2\frac{m\lambda }{\hbar ^2}\psi (0)$$ leaves me with ##k=-\frac{im\lambda}{\hbar ^2}##.

With given ##k## and after normalization of the function, we finally get to the desired wavefunction $$\psi (x)=\sqrt{\frac{m\lambda }{\hbar ^2}}e^{-\frac{m\lambda }{\hbar ^2}|x|}$$

a) I seriously hope there is an easier way than $$<E>=\int _{-infty}^{\infty} \psi(x)[-\frac{\hbar ^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2 }{\partial x^2}-\lambda \delta (x)]\psi (x)dx=\frac{5m\lambda}{2\hbar ^2}$$ Doing the same horrible integral for ##<E^2>=<\frac{p^4}{4m^2}-\lambda \frac{p^2}{2m}\delta(x)+\lambda ^2 \delta (x)>## will eventually bring me to ##\delta _E=\sqrt{<E^2>-<E>^2} ##

b) I am quite unsure if this is correct: $$P=\frac{<x>_{part}}{<x>}$$ where ##<x>_{part}=2\int_{0}^{\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}}\psi (x)^2 dx## and ##<x>=2\int_{0}^{\infty }\psi (x)^2 dx##. Or is it?

Why I am confused, is that if we for example had Harmonic oscillator ##|\psi,0>=\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}(|0>+|1>)##. Than we only have to calculate ##|\psi, t>=p_1|0>+p_2|1>## because ##p_1^2## and ##p_2^2## represent the probability that the particle is in given state. However, I am bit lost in my case. :/

Ok and no idea about c) and d) :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem statement is misleading - in general, a particle in this potential can be free, and have whatever energy it likes to have.
In a bound state (=what you calculated - it also helps for c and d), what do you expect for ##\delta_E##? And I would expect <E> to be negative.

(b) I would not call it <x> because it is not the expectation value of the position. The formulas look good.
 
Yeah I can see that. That is because I left out the most important part.
At time ##t=0## the particle is in ground state.

a) Energy is simply ##E=\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}k^2=-\frac{m\lambda ^2}{2\hbar ^2}##. I was also suspicious because energy wasn't negative, but this seems to be a better solution now. No integration needed.

b) I was worried the notation may be a bit strange, but as long as we both understand it, it's fine. =)

Also, I got some answers for c) and d) and I would like to check if they make any sense at all:

c) Since the particle is in ground state, it can only move to higher energy levels, but for that it needs to somehow get that extra energy. Since the problem doesn't state anything about putting extra energy to the system, I assume it is safe to say that the particle will only (and also always - meaning for ##t>0##) be in ground state.
According to this, the answer to c) is the energy calculated in b) with probability 1. And the answer to part d) is that nothing changes.
 
I would answer the same for (c) and (d). They just look a bit odd.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top