How does a Penning trap determine the upper limit of the electron radius?

  • Thread starter Thread starter granpa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius
granpa
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
7
how is a penning trap used to determine the upper limit of the electron radius. google hasnt been much help.

I found this but I don't understand it at all.

http://cerncourier.com/cws/article/cern/29724

What can be learned from the more accurate electron g? The first result beyond g itself is the fine structure constant, α = e2/4πε0hbarc – the fundamental measure of the strength of the electromagnetic interaction, and also a crucial ingredient in our system of fundamental constants. A Dirac point particle has g = 2. QED predicts that vacuum fluctuations and polarization slightly increase this value.

The third use of the measured g is in probing the internal structure of the electron – limiting the electron to constituents with a mass m* > m/√(δg/2) = 130 GeV/c2, corresponding to an electron radius R <1 × 10–18 m. If this test was limited only by our experimental uncertainty in g, then we could set a limit m* > 600 GeV. This is not as stringent as the related limit set by LEP, which probes for a contact interaction at 10.3 TeV. However, the limit is obtained quite differently, and is somewhat remarkable for an experiment carried out at 100 mK.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org

Wikipedia cites the abstract in reference 2.
Wikipedia said:
The electron is described as a fundamental or elementary particle. It has no known substructure.[2][64] Hence, it is defined or assumed to be a point charge with no spatial extent—a point particle.[10] Observation of a single electron in a Penning trap shows the upper limit of the particle's radius is 10−22 meters.[65] The classical electron radius is 2.8179 × 10−15 m. This is the radius that is inferred from the electron's electric charge, by assuming that its mass energy has exclusively electrostatic origin and using the classical theory of electrodynamics alone ignoring quantum mechanics.

QED Penning trap upper limit for the electron particle radius:
r_e \leq 10^{-22} \; \text{m}

reference 2 said:
The quantum numbers of the geonium "atom", an electron in a Penning trap, have been continuously monitored in a non-destructive way by the new "continuous" Stern-Gerlach effect. In this way the g-factors of electron and positron have been determined to unprecedented precision:

\frac{1}{2} g = \frac{v_s}{v_c} = 1.001 159 652 188(4)

Wikipedia said:
In quantum mechanics, the Stern–Gerlach experiment[1], named after Otto Stern and Walther Gerlach, is an important 1922 experiment on the deflection of particles, often used to illustrate basic principles of quantum mechanics. It can be used to demonstrate that electrons and atoms have intrinsically quantum properties, and how measurement in quantum mechanics affects the system being measured.
[/Color]
Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penning_trap"
http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1402-4896/1988/T22/016/"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern%E2%80%93Gerlach_experiment"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thank you

http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1402-4896/1988/T22/016/

The classical notion of an atomic particle at rest in free space is discussed, and shown to be approximable by zero-point confinement of the particle in a laboratory trap. An important tool for cooling the particle, and in the case of an electron, for obtaining directly the difference of spin and cyclotron frequencies vs, vc, is side band excitation. The quantum numbers of the geonium "atom", an electron in a Penning trap, have been continuously monitored in a non-destructive way by the new "continuous" Stern-Gerlach effect. In this way the g-factors of electron and positron have been determined to unprecedented precision,

½g ≡ vs/vc ≡ 1.001 159 652 188(4),

providing the most severe tests of QED and of the CPT symmetry theorem, for charged elementary particles. From the close agreement of experimental and theoretical g-values a new, 10^4 × smaller, value for the electron radius, Rg < 10^-20 cm, may be extracted.[/color]
 
learning more about the anomalous magnetic moments of electrons, and muons, can lead one to find corrections and contributions from non-Standard Model particles/interactions.

See for instance g-2 experiment home page:
http://www.g-2.bnl.gov/

If you want more information:
http://dorigo.wordpress.com/2006/09/20/muon-g-2-and-supersymmetry/
http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.4905

Similar measurements on rare decays such as pi0-> e+e- can reveal if there is contribution from non-SM particles/interactions.
 
Geonium atom...


Wikipedia said:
A single charged particle can be trapped indefinitely in a Penning trap. Penning trap is a combination of a homogeneous magnetic field and an electrostatic quadrupole potential. A small cloud of charged particles in such a trap is like a many electron atom, with the difference that the role of the atomic nucleus is played by an adjustable external field in the trap. Such a system is called a "geonium atom" [1], since the binding is to an external apparatus residing on the Earth.

In the simplest case, the system consists of only one electron or only one ion in the trap. This is analogous to the hydrogen atom. The properties of this single bound particle can be measured and calculated with a very high precision.
[/Color]
Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geonium_atom"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top