How Does a Skier's Energy Change Through Different Stages?

  • Thread starter Thread starter katj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the energy changes a skier experiences during different stages of skiing. In Stage 1, work done by the chairlift is positive as the force is in the same direction as displacement. Stage 2 sees the skier at the mountaintop, possessing positive potential energy. In Stage 3, the skier has positive kinetic energy at the bottom of the slope. Stage 4 involves negative work done as friction opposes the skier's motion, leading to a stop. Understanding these energy transitions clarifies the skier's energy dynamics throughout the skiing experience.
katj
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
"A skier (total mass, ski included) catches a ride on a life to the top of a mountain (Stage 1 to stage 2). Once at the top, the skier heads down the slope, reaches the base of the mountain (Stage 3), and coasts to a stop (Stage 4).

Stage 1: Work done on the skier by the chairlift.
Stage 2: Potential Energy of the skier at the mountaintop.
Stage 3: Kinetic energy of the skier at the bottom of the mountain.
Stage 4: Work done on the skier to come to a stop.

Us this scenario to describe the signs (positive or negative) of the energy in each of these stages of the scenario.

A. Positive, Positive, Positive, Positive
B. Positive, Positive, Positive, and Negative
C. Positive, Positive, Negative, Positive
D. Negative, Positive, Positive, Negative
E. Negative, Positive, Positive, Positive

I am thinking that the answer should E, but I am not sure. It takes energy to do work, so stages 1 and 4 would be negative (I guess?). Stages 2 and 3 describe energy that the skier HAS, so they would be positive. I think!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
katj said:
It takes energy to do work, so stages 1 and 4 would be negative (I guess?).
I don't understand your reasoning here. Hint: If the energy has increased, the work done was positive.
Stages 2 and 3 describe energy that the skier HAS, so they would be positive.
Makes sense.
 
welcome to pf!

hi katj! welcome to pf! :smile:

work done is force times displacement (technically, force "dot" the displacement of the point of application of the force), so it'll be positive if the force is in the same direction as the displacement, and negative if it's in the opposite direction :wink:

and potential energy is defined as minus the work done (by a conservative force, such as gravity)

does that help? :smile:
 
Let me try again! Does this make more sense?

Stage 1- positive because the force is in the same direction as displacement
Stage 2- positive because the skier would have lots of potential energy at the top
Stage 3- positive because the skier would have lots of kinetic energy at the bottom
Stage 4- negative because the displacement is forward and the force (of friction) is going back

PS- Thanks for the help!
 
Good!
 
Yay! Thanks for all of the help! This makes sense now!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top