How Does a Thin Glass Affect the Double Slit Interference Pattern?

AI Thread Summary
Light of wavelength 600nm passing through two slits separated by 0.2mm creates an interference pattern observed on a screen 1.0m away. The m = 1 bright fringe is located at 3mm from the central maximum. Introducing a thin piece of glass over one slit delays the light by 5.0 X 10^-16s, equating to a phase difference of π/2. The central maximum shifts toward the glass-covered slit, with a calculated displacement of 0.003mm or 3 microns. Understanding these shifts is crucial for analyzing interference patterns in optics.
G01
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,704
Reaction score
19
Light of wavelength 600nm passes through two slits separated by .2mm and is observed on a screen 1.0m behind the slits. The location of the central max is marked on the screen and labeled y_0

A) at what distance are the m = 1 bright fringes. I got this part. the answer is .003m or 3mm.

B) A very thin piece of glass is placed over one hole, causing the light in that hole to move slower. The light is delayed by 5.0 X 10^-16s. What fraction of the wave period is this. It is 1/4 of the wave period. I got this as well.

C) The phase difference? The one wave is delayed by 1/4 of a period, so the phase difference is pi/2.

D) Which way does the central max move and how far. I know it moves toward the glass covered hole, but I can't figure out how far. Can anyone help me to figure out how to proceed with this part. Even a small hint will help. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The central max moves toward the glass covered hole, but the exact distance it moves depends on the wavelength of the light. Using the equation d = (mλ)/(2d_s), where m is the order of the max (in this case, 0), λ is the wavelength of the light (600 nm), and d_s is the slit separation (0.2mm), you can calculate the distance the central max moves. This gives a displacement of 0.003 mm, or 3 microns.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top