How Does a Uniform Spherical Charge Influence a Linear Charge Along the Z-Axis?

schattenjaeger
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
A line charge of length L with lamba=const.(linear charge density) lies along the positive Z axis with its ends located at z=z0 and z0+L. Find the total force on the line charge due to a uniform spherical charge distribution with center at origin and radius a<z0

Sooo here's what I DID

I knew the total charge contained on the line charge was lamba*L, and the total charge contained in the sphere was 4/3 pi a^3 * rho where rho was its charge density, and it could be treated like a point particle with that total charge since the line charge didn't go inside it.

So my vector going from the origin to my field point was r=zk(k unit vector in z direction)and r'=0 since the source point was on the origin,so R^2=z^2

so the Force on a point on the line charge I took to be q*q'/r^2 in the z direction which was, after simplifying, (lamba*L*a^3*rho)/(3ez^2) where e is permitivitty of free space or whatever. so integrating over the whole line charge, ie F=S(allthat)*dz from z0 to z0+L, well, ALMOST gave me the right answer, I got an L^2 in the final answer when there should be just a single L

so I think earlier when I was finding the force at a point on the line charge, I had to JUST use lambda and not the whole line charge lamda*L?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you hav got the problem, and cahrge on each elemnent of the stick is Lam.dr.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top