How Does a Variable Coefficient of Kinetic Friction Affect Block Acceleration?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 13K views
bestchemist
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A block of mass m is at rest at the origin at t=0. It is pushed with constant force F0 from x=0 to x=L across a horizontal surface whose coefficient of kinetic friction is μk=μ0(1−x/L). That is, the coefficient of friction decreases from μ0 at x=0 to zero at x=L.

Homework Equations



ax = (dvx/dx)vx
a = (F0 - mg(1-x/L))/m

The Attempt at a Solution


√(2L(F0m−μ0g))+√μ0gL

and it wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the problem?
 
voko said:
What is the problem?

find an expression for the block's velocity when it reaches position x=L.
Express your answer in terms of the variables L, F0, m, μ0, and appropriate constants.
 
bestchemist said:
find an expression for the block's velocity when it reaches position x=L.
Express your answer in terms of the variables L, F0, m, μ0, and appropriate constants.
Please show your work. It looks like you made some math errors, and you also left out a factor of μ0 in your equation for the acceleration.
 
Chestermiller said:
Please show your work. It looks like you made some math errors, and you also left out a factor of μ0 in your equation for the acceleration.

a = (F0 - mg(1-x/L))/m
vdx = (Fo/m)dx - uogdx + (uog/L)xdx
(1/2)v^2 = (Fo/m)x - uogx + (uog/2L)x^2
and solve for v and plug x = L
I got
√(2L(F0m−μ0g))+√μ0gL
 
bestchemist said:
(1/2)v^2 = (Fo/m)x - uogx + (uog/2L)x^2
and solve for v and plug x = L
Right so far
I got
√(2L(F0m−μ0g))+√μ0gL
That's certainly wrong. For others to see where you went wrong you will need to post every step of your working.
 
haruspex said:
Right so far
That's certainly wrong. For others to see where you went wrong you will need to post every step of your working.

(1/2)v^2 = (Fo/m)x - uogx + (uog/2L)x^2
and solve for v and plug x = L
v^2 = 2 (Fo/m)x - 2 uogx+ 2(uog/2L)x^2
v^2 = 2x ((Fo/m)- uog) + (uog/L)x^2
v^2 = 2L((Fo/m)- uog) + (uogL)

v= √(2L((Fo/m)- uog) + (uogL))

is it right?
 
bestchemist said:
(1/2)v^2 = (Fo/m)x - uogx + (uog/2L)x^2
and solve for v and plug x = L
v^2 = 2 (Fo/m)x - 2 uogx+ 2(uog/2L)x^2
v^2 = 2x ((Fo/m)- uog) + (uog/L)x^2
v^2 = 2L((Fo/m)- uog) + (uogL)

v= √(2L((Fo/m)- uog) + (uogL))

is it right?
Yes, but you can simplify it a little.
 
haruspex said:
Yes, but you can simplify it a little.

Where can I simplify it? I thought I already simplified it to the most simplest form.
Can you give some hint?
 
Chestermiller said:
Check out the terms under the radical (which extends over the entire rhs), and see if you can combine anything.

okay.. got it
 
Last edited: