How Does a Water Drop's Speed Change as It Falls and Gains Mass?

martyg314
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This is for a mechanics class. I'm sort of re-learning how to apply calculus and differential equations in this class, so I get stuck trying to figure out how to apply the math I learned 2 or more semesters ago. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

m.g.

Homework Statement



"A spherical water drop falls through the atmosphere and its mass increases at a
rate proportional to its area. Find the speed of the drop as a function of time, assuming
that the drop started with zero initial speed."

- disregard drag in this problem
- starting mass is a finite mass
- for the area, cross sectional area or surface area can be used, but cross-sectional area will probably be easier

Homework Equations



I modeled this as a momentum problem, similar to a rocket losing mass as it accelerates, but instead as a drop gaining mass as it falls

The Attempt at a Solution



the increase in mass is proportional to the area (I used the cross section):

\frac{dm}{dt} = k4\pir^{2}


The forces are gravity and the changing momentum:

F=mg-\frac{dp}{dt}

which simplifies to:
\frac{dv}{dt} = g - (\frac{v}{m})\frac{dm}{dt}

Substituting in, I get the differential equation which is where I'm stuck:

\frac{dv}{dt} = g - (\frac{v}{m})k4\pir^{2}

I think I need to remove the m from the equation to solve for v but since r changes as a function of time as well, that doesn't seem to help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
m = (4/3)πr3ρ ?
 
could you not deduce from the mass differential equation that dr/dt is a constant
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the tips. I think I finally got it.

Knowing that \frac{dR}{dt} is constant, R = kt + R0

I also used the mass/volume/density equation suggested above.

I switched variables to get the equation:

\frac{dv}{dR} = \frac{g}{k} - \frac{3v}{R}

(\rho omitted since we are dealing with water)

And I solved from there.

Thanks for the help. I can see how relatively simple it is now.

-mg
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top