How Does Adding Mass Affect the Angular Velocity of a Merry-Go-Round?

  • Thread starter Thread starter melissa_y
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the new angular velocity of a merry-go-round after four people step onto it. Initially, the merry-go-round has a moment of inertia of 1665 kg*m² and an angular velocity of 0.730 rad/s. To find the new moment of inertia, the masses of the four individuals are added, resulting in a total moment of inertia of 10073.64 kg*m². Using the conservation of angular momentum, the new angular velocity is calculated to be 0.121 rad/s. This illustrates the relationship between mass, moment of inertia, and angular velocity in rotational dynamics.
melissa_y
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
A 5.4m diameter merry-go-round is rotating freely with an angular velocity of 0.730 rad/s. Its total moment of inertia is 1665kg*m2. Four people standing on the ground, each of mass 60.8kg, suddenly step onto the edge of the merry-go-round. What is the angular velocity of the merry-go-round now? Use units of "rad/s".

r = 2.7 m
w= .730 rad/s
I= 1665 kg*m2

I'm not sure if I'm doing this right but what i did was i set the inertia equal to mk^2. By doing this i was able to find the initial mass to be 228.395 kg. Then i added the weight of the four people to this mass and got 471.595 kg. Then I solved for that moment of inertia to be (471.595)(2.7)^2 which ended up being 3437.93kg*m2. Now I'm not sure how to find the angular velocity...I tried to just set the values equal to one another, hoping the proportion would produce the right value but that didn't work. I have no idea...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You do not need to know the total mass. What you need to find is the moment of inertia after the people step on. Moment of inertia is a sum of bits of mass times the distance from the axis squared for each of those bits of mass. Each of the four people add to the moment of inertia of the merry-go-round with their mass times their distance from the axis, which is the radius. What you did worked out correctly because you assumed all the mass of the merry-go-round was at the circumference to calculate its mass. That need not be true. You should have just added 4*60.8kg*radius^2 to the given moment of inertia. The result would have been the same.

This problem is about conservation of angular mometum. None of the people have any until they get on the merry-go-round. How is angular momentum related to I and w? If you increase I, what must happen to w?
 


Your approach is on the right track, but there are a few errors in your calculations. First, the initial mass should be 1665 kg, not 228.395 kg. This is the total moment of inertia, not the mass. Also, when adding the weight of the four people, you should use their masses (60.8 kg each), not their weights. This would give a total mass of 1665 + (4*60.8) = 1907.2 kg.

Next, to find the new moment of inertia, you need to use the parallel axis theorem, which states that the moment of inertia of a system can be calculated by adding the moment of inertia of the system's center of mass and the product of the total mass and the square of the distance between the center of mass and the new axis of rotation. In this case, the center of mass of the system is at a distance of 2.7 m from the axis of rotation, so the new moment of inertia would be 1665 + (1907.2*2.7^2) = 10073.64 kg*m^2.

Finally, to find the new angular velocity, you can use the conservation of angular momentum, which states that the initial angular momentum of a system is equal to the final angular momentum of the system. In this case, the initial angular momentum is (1665*0.730) = 1214.95 kg*m^2/s. After the four people step onto the merry-go-round, the new angular momentum would be (10073.64*w), where w is the new angular velocity. Setting these two values equal to each other and solving for w, we get w = 0.121 rad/s.

So, the new angular velocity of the merry-go-round would be 0.121 rad/s. I hope this helps clarify the problem for you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top