How Does Altitude Affect Gravity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the acceleration due to gravity on a satellite at an altitude of 12,000 km above Earth. The formula used is g = GM/r^2, where r is the Earth's radius plus the altitude converted to meters. The user initially calculated a value of 9.79882 m/s² but is unsure if it's correct. Suggestions include ensuring proper unit conversion and acknowledging that online platforms may have strict accuracy requirements. The user is awaiting feedback on their submission after the deadline.
singinglupine
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
A space shuttle is flying at an altitude of 12.000 km above the Earth. A satellite in its cargo bay is floating freely and its engines are about to boost it to a higher orbit. What is the acceleration due to gravity on the satellite? The radius of the Earth is 6370 km. The mass of the Earth is 5.980×1024 kg. Enter you answer with an accuracy of 0.01%.

This is what I've figured out:

g = GM/r^2 in which r is the radius of the Earth plus my distance 12 km so that I get g =((5.98e24)(6.674e-11))/((6370 +12)*1000)^2

This isn't working for me, I get 9.79882, I've tried many versions of this. Any suggestions where I'm going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try converting km to m and then see what you get.
 
After adding 12 to 6370, I did multiple it by 1000 to convert to meters.
 
singinglupine said:
A space shuttle is flying at an altitude of 12.000 km above the Earth. A satellite in its cargo bay is floating freely and its engines are about to boost it to a higher orbit. What is the acceleration due to gravity on the satellite? The radius of the Earth is 6370 km. The mass of the Earth is 5.980×1024 kg. Enter you answer with an accuracy of 0.01%.

This is what I've figured out:

g = GM/r^2 in which r is the radius of the Earth plus my distance 12 km so that I get g =((5.98e24)(6.674e-11))/((6370 +12)*1000)^2

This isn't working for me, I get 9.79882, I've tried many versions of this. Any suggestions where I'm going wrong?

Looks ok to me. :smile:
 
Thanks, the deadline has passed so the answers will be up in a couple hours and I'll see how far off I was. Sometimes the online problem site will be really picky how close your answer is.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top