How Does Altitude Affect Gravity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the acceleration due to gravity on a satellite at an altitude of 12,000 km above Earth. The formula used is g = GM/r^2, where r is the Earth's radius plus the altitude converted to meters. The user initially calculated a value of 9.79882 m/s² but is unsure if it's correct. Suggestions include ensuring proper unit conversion and acknowledging that online platforms may have strict accuracy requirements. The user is awaiting feedback on their submission after the deadline.
singinglupine
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
A space shuttle is flying at an altitude of 12.000 km above the Earth. A satellite in its cargo bay is floating freely and its engines are about to boost it to a higher orbit. What is the acceleration due to gravity on the satellite? The radius of the Earth is 6370 km. The mass of the Earth is 5.980×1024 kg. Enter you answer with an accuracy of 0.01%.

This is what I've figured out:

g = GM/r^2 in which r is the radius of the Earth plus my distance 12 km so that I get g =((5.98e24)(6.674e-11))/((6370 +12)*1000)^2

This isn't working for me, I get 9.79882, I've tried many versions of this. Any suggestions where I'm going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try converting km to m and then see what you get.
 
After adding 12 to 6370, I did multiple it by 1000 to convert to meters.
 
singinglupine said:
A space shuttle is flying at an altitude of 12.000 km above the Earth. A satellite in its cargo bay is floating freely and its engines are about to boost it to a higher orbit. What is the acceleration due to gravity on the satellite? The radius of the Earth is 6370 km. The mass of the Earth is 5.980×1024 kg. Enter you answer with an accuracy of 0.01%.

This is what I've figured out:

g = GM/r^2 in which r is the radius of the Earth plus my distance 12 km so that I get g =((5.98e24)(6.674e-11))/((6370 +12)*1000)^2

This isn't working for me, I get 9.79882, I've tried many versions of this. Any suggestions where I'm going wrong?

Looks ok to me. :smile:
 
Thanks, the deadline has passed so the answers will be up in a couple hours and I'll see how far off I was. Sometimes the online problem site will be really picky how close your answer is.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top